Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Neeka who wrote (463335)	1/4/2012 2:13:02 PM
From: MJ	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 793970

That's the problem, the next guy in line.

To: Neeka who wrote (463335)	1/4/2012 2:25:15 PM
From: Paul Smith	1 Recommendation Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 793970

the liberal/progressive Mitt Romney Four years ago, Romney was seen as the conservative alternative to "liberal/progressive" McCain. The key fact is - anybody in the race would be far better than Obama.

To: Neeka who wrote (463335)	1/4/2012 4:05:15 PM
From: MrLucky	Respond to of 793970

<<.Republicans always end up nominating the next guy in line. >> That is why it is so critical to get the right people into the Congress. Until that is done, we will continue to see the establishment RINOs in line. We need at least three or four more 2010 election results in the House and Senate before real quality conservative candidates will actually have a shot at winning the POTUS. Meanwhile, we vote for the McCains, the Doles etc. as the alternative. BTW, I see McCain's endorsement of Romney as a payback for Romney supporting McCain in his last senate run. Secondly, I suspect McCain would not refuse the VP or the DOD job should it be offered by Romney.