Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: J_F_Shepard who wrote (641025)	1/4/2012 3:58:14 PM
From: Brumar89	2 Recommendations Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1580471

No, my references just referred to studies by Connecticutt's Depts of Public Health and Environmental Protection. They are beautiful animals that most people like to watch, not kill.... No one is calling for wiping out America's deer population. Hunters especially, don't want that. They think they're beautiful too. But if you use reason rather than emotion, you'll realize that beauty doesn't mean we shouldn't control animal populations. the application of topical acaricides to white-tailed deer to kill ticks feeding on the deer. It consists of a feeding station with four paint rollers that hold the pesticide. For that to be effective, we'd need one or more of those feeding stations on almost every square mile of US territory. And a massive bureaucracy to stock these feeding stations and administer them. I guess that would be the liberal solution because liberal ideas always involve spending lots and lots of money for things that aren't very worthwhile.