Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: DMaA who wrote (463506)	1/4/2012 10:59:38 PM
From: ManyMoose	Respond to of 793958

I can't quote chapter and verse, but it seems to me that they are all saying that. Federal government is big enough and that he will fight to (at least) freeze it at it's present catastrophic level

To: DMaA who wrote (463506)	1/4/2012 11:25:55 PM
From: Thehammer	1 Recommendation Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 793958

Let me say it another way. I have a standard. The candidate that I vote for has to convince me that he thinks the Federal government is big enough and that he will fight to (at least) freeze it at it's present catastrophic level. If that is too much to ask than screw it. My vote is wasted either way. I don't think we have a choice if we have any hope for survival. Speaking of "Too Big To Fail" no corporation has anything for the excesses of the government. If don't change we will follow the path of Greece and Italy and there will be no bailing us out. The Mayan calendar ends in the year 2012 and some folks have opined that a natural calamity of cataclysmic proportion will be fall us. Perhaps the Mayans were right but the actual cause is a nuclear war provoked by a global financial collapse