Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Liberalism: Do You Agree We've Had Enough of It? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: joefromspringfield who wrote (121231)	1/5/2012 5:12:51 PM
From: locogringo	2 Recommendations Respond to of 224704

Joeyboy, I don't believe we have had one since this fool has been in office. Next he should take personal responsibility. We know he will never do that. If he is reelected we are Greece in a few years. Joeyboy and threaders, but is your solution what nobody can tell how see to the end, don't you agree or know? We will wait and there is change, although Right now the House TEA Party Death Squads and Republicans righties are and get balmed for losses of income by those expecting new cars and not getting section 8 checks or food stamps in January. Come with solutions, and no whining, threader Joe. (If this post makes no sense to you, I just wanted you to feel at home as if Comrade Paul V was answering you)

To: joefromspringfield who wrote (121231)	1/5/2012 5:31:19 PM
From: Paul V.	1 Recommendation Respond to of 224704

joe, That money has been spent and there is nothing anyone can do about that. It is what we spend going forward that counts. Lets pass a budget. I don't believe we have had one since this fool has been in office. I agree with you. However, how are we specially going to resolve the financial dilemma? Where and what cuts do we make and/or where and what revenues are we going to increase? Then, how can we achieve the objectives we come up with knowing that it will take at least 61 votes in the US Senate to pass any legislation whoever is in control. The Senate procedure of requiring 61 votes for stopping a filibuster means that the current healthcare bill will stand unless the US Supreme Court strikes down the healthcare bill along with its agencies rules and regulations. The minority will continue to control. Even then most healthcare institutions are in the process of having implemented most of the healthcare provisions. I just recently read in the WSJ that even Roberts and Scalia will probably rule in favor of supporting the current healthcare bill as written.