SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Apple Tankwatch -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: sylvester80 who wrote (14721)1/6/2012 12:00:24 PM
From: rnsmth  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 32692
 
<<First time I see anyone poopooing a $4.5 billion dollar profit for 3 months... LMFAO... too funny.>>

In Apple's fiscal q4 you poo-pooped Apple's results

From their conference call for that quarter

Net income was $6.6 billion, increasing 54% year-over-year

That was for 3 months.

So, in a poor quarter for Apple, they earned 2.1 billion (46%) more than Samsung did in a record quarter

Wait until Jan 24 to see a really impressive, record number



To: sylvester80 who wrote (14721)1/6/2012 12:49:25 PM
From: Cogito  Respond to of 32692
 
Well, I imagine that you're correct that Samsung would do fine without Apple, though they do make a fair amount of money selling to Apple.

As for the $4.5 billion dollar profit, that's a good quarter. It's just less than half of what Apple will report, is all I'm saying. It means that Apple produced more profit from just the iPhone in the past quarter than Samsung made altogether. And Apple has three other highly profitable product lines as well.



To: sylvester80 who wrote (14721)1/6/2012 2:27:57 PM
From: pyslent  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 32692
 
"First time I see anyone poopooing a $4.5 billion dollar profit for 3 months"

Is it the first time? Seems to me, you poopoo'ed Apple's $6.6B "implosion" last quarter.