Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : View from the Center and Left -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: KyrosL who wrote (178718)	1/6/2012 4:04:51 PM
From: T L Comiskey	Respond to of 541599

autos are a self inflicted wound.... .fracking..is not.. the industry.. refuses to accept responsibility.. yet.. they hope that the problems will not be..... found out in court the EPA is 'considering' trucking drinking water to areas in Pa.... who pays for that....?? ................................................. gas vs coal impacts..... solar is more efficient... just the facts thinkprogress.org

To: KyrosL who wrote (178718)	1/6/2012 7:19:55 PM
From: Cogito	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 541599

>>Automobiles kill thousands every year. Should we ban them?<< You think possibly contaminating aquifers on which large segments of our population depend for survival is a trivial matter? Methane is certainly toxic, and it has already appeared in the drinking water in more than one place that just happened to be near franking operations. Measuring these things by "dollar of output" really doesn't make sense. If you fuck up an aquifer, you can't get it back.