To: E_K_S who wrote (10709 ) 1/6/2012 4:56:36 PM From: JimisJim 3 Recommendations Respond to of 34328 SDRL is in a growth sub sector of the oil services sector, IMO... and pays a nice divvy... it is a bit more speculative in that it hasn't got decades of history behind it, but I wouldn't count on the share price dropping significantly just to trade out and back in... it might, but it may also go up from here -- 52 week high is almost 12% higher than current price and 52 week low is 30% lower, so it is not cheap, nor is it expensive IMO... the main thing is that even if the price dips, your divvy will capture the lower prices going forward as a sort of dollar cost averaging... if you want to trade stocks based on share price, I suggest getting to know a lot more about the high-spec ultradeepwater drilling platform demand and supply and then compare SDRL vs. RIG, DO, maybe ESV... there aren't a lot of players in this area and demand looks to be steady and perhaps growing. Do your own DD, but know that after 30 years in the offshore oil industry, I trade OSX stocks a lot less frequently and bought SDRL last year as a long term hold and addition to my divvy PF... OSX stocks can be quite volatile, but do not necessarily trade based on the current price of oil -- companies like SDRL depend on very long lead-time projects that cost billions and the decisions to buy SDRL rigs are driven by the long view, not the short-term wiggles in the price of oil... they can't (and won't) accept orders and let them be cancelled without huge penalties... they get substantial money up front along with progress payments and these rigs take a long time to build, more time to commission and more time to actually begin operations. Just some thoughts I wanted to share as I don't see SDRL as a trading vehicle... I would look more toward trades in RIG or HAL as they are trading very cheaply unless/until they settle with BP over Macondo and from what I hear via the grapevine, there are very serious negotiations for them to settle, leaving BP as the lone defendant in all future litigation over the deaths and financial hits as a result of Deepwater Horizon (a rig I worked on two different times for two different companies who are not involved in any liability from the accident). Best, Jim