SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Liberalism: Do You Agree We've Had Enough of It? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: TopCat who wrote (121315)1/6/2012 8:10:18 PM
From: tonto1 Recommendation  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 224668
 
What he says must not be taken out of context. It is important to include the whole statement...I take it that what he is saying is that our country will be better off by having the President making better decisions and not to play the game that he is...

Professor from Univerity of Chicago Law School...

"It is for the Senate, and not for the president, to determine whether the Senate is in session," said Prof. Richard Epstein of the University of Chicago Law School.
"For the president to say that the Senate is not in session when the Senate says that it is, a set of constitutional confrontations that we would be far better off doing without," he said.



To: TopCat who wrote (121315)1/6/2012 10:18:24 PM
From: Kenneth E. Phillipps  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 224668
 
If the Senate doesn't like it, they can sue Obama. LOL!