Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : President Barack Obama -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: steve harris who wrote (107062)	1/7/2012 12:52:16 PM
From: tejek	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 149317

U.S. could be in cycle of robust job growth, economists contend WASHINGTON -- Four painful years after the Great Recession struck and wiped out 8.7 million jobs, the U.S. may finally be in an elusive pattern known as the virtuous cycle -- an escalating loop of robust job growth, healthier spending and higher demand. The nation added 200,000 jobs in December in a burst of hiring that drove the unemployment rate down two ticks to 8.5%, its lowest rate in almost three years, and led economists to conclude that the improvement in the job market might just last. "There is more horsepower to this economy than most believe," said Sung Won Sohn, an economics professor at California State University, Channel Islands. "The stars are aligned right for a meaningful economic recovery." It was the sixth month in a row that the economy added at least 100,000 jobs, the longest streak since 2006. The economy added jobs every month last year, the first time that has happened since 2005. And the unemployment rate, which peaked at 10.1% in October 2009 and stood at 9.1% at the start of last year, has fallen for four months straight. Michigan's unemployment rate was 9.8% for November, down from 10.6% in October. If economics textbooks and the best hopes of millions of unemployed Americans are confirmed, the virtuous cycle may be under way, which would suggest the job market will get stronger yet. When more Americans are hired, they have more money to spend. When more money courses through the economy, businesses can justify hiring more people. That means more jobs, more spending and more demand for businesses. Which leads to still more hiring, spending and demand. That would be the reverse of the vicious cycle that took hold during the Great Recession. People lost jobs and spent less money, so businesses rang up less sales and were forced to lay off more people. That led to even less spending and more layoffs. "The labor market is healing," said Diane Swonk, chief economist at Mesirow Financial. She cautioned that "we still have a long way to go -- years -- to recoup the losses we have endured." Indeed, the economy added 1.6 million jobs for all of 2011. That is better than the 940,000 it added during 2010. In 2009, the most bruising year of the Great Recession, the nation lost more than 5 million. But it will take 6 million more jobs to get the U.S. back to what it had in December 2007, when the recession began. Economists forecast the nation will add almost 2 million this year. The unemployment report was the first to be released since Republicans across the country began voting to determine a candidate to face President Barack Obama this fall in an election that will likely turn on the economy. Obama appears bound to face voters with the highest unemployment rate of any president running for re-election since World War II. Unemployment was 7.8% when Obama took office. But the president's re-election chances may hinge more on the direction of the unemployment rate than on what the rate is on Election Day. The rate was 7.2% when Ronald Reagan beat Walter Mondale in 1984, but it had fallen from 10.8% two years before the election. Obama, visiting the new Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, said: "We have made real progress. Now is not the time to stop." He called on Congress to extend a Social Security payroll tax cut that is due to expire at the end of next month. Campaigning in New Hampshire for Obama's job, former Pennsylvania Sen. Rick Santorum claimed credit for Republicans, suggesting the gains were tied to voter optimism that a Republican would take the White House. "There's a lot of concern still," added Santorum, who finished in a virtual tie with former Mass. Gov. Mitt Romney in the Iowa caucuses earlier this week. Another candidate, former House Speaker Newt Gingrich, dismissed the job gains as inadequate. Hiring increased across industries. Manufacturing added 23,000 jobs, as did the health care industry. Transportation and warehousing added 50,000 jobs. Retailers added 28,000. Even the beleaguered construction industry added 17,000. freep.com

To: steve harris who wrote (107062)	1/7/2012 1:39:05 PM
From: ChinuSFO	Respond to of 149317

Can you mention anything good that Bush II did? It is interesting that you ask. Bush could not recall a mistake he had made during the first 4 years in office. Shouldn't that be sufficient to indicate that all what he did was good? why do we have to make an effort to figure it out when Bush himself as our President has indicated that all what he did was good. Now the military families may disagree with W. But that is the problem of the military families.

To: steve harris who wrote (107062)	1/7/2012 3:04:54 PM
From: Sr K	Respond to of 149317

For the opposite, what W and Obama did to bail out GM without throwing ResCap into a separate Chapter 11, was unforgivable. The private equity controlling owner of ResCap, Cerberus Capital, should have lost their equity investment. Instead, it got rolled into Ally Bank, and their 51% got cut to under 20%, maybe as low as 9%. The transition to a new President, starting 2 months before November 2008, was with a background of the TARP $700 billion funding request, it getting first voted down, then getting split into Part 1 under Bush and Part 2 under Obama, made it a very difficult transition. But ResCap, hidden to many, within GM, is what really brought down GMAC. Bottom line is that the Obama Administration bailed out a failed home loans and mortgage operation. And all he talks about, about it, and the governor of Michigan, is the auto side and the jobs still in Michigan.

To: steve harris who wrote (107062)	1/7/2012 9:37:26 PM
From: manalagi	Respond to of 149317

Sure! Bush II could not recall making any mistake. As a Republican I cannot understand how any pub can support for no returning to Clinton tax rate for the very wealthy and the same time willing to increase taxes for the middle class: 1. We had a great economy during Clinton years with tax rates higher than Bush II, and yet Bush II lowering taxes for the rich have not created more jobs. Where is the trickle down economy? And GOP still subscribe to Laffer's curve. 2. Most people and that includes people who want Obama be a one term POTUS are middle class or lower. So, those pubs would rather lower their standard of living and at the same time giving very rich people at least a million $ lower tax rate, and possibly not paying tax at all. Why would Romney not releasing his tax return? Afraid to show he he paid less tax rate than a school teacher? 3. How many of posters on this thread making more than a million$/year. To those, I can tip my hat off for wanting Obama be defeated in 2012. But those in the middle class, how can they prefer policies that hurt themselves economically?