Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : The Obama - Clinton Disaster -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: John who wrote (63702)	1/7/2012 4:03:47 PM
From: Follies	1 Recommendation Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 103300

At the risk of inserting myself in the middle of this I will pose a question. We all have an agenda of changes we would like to see in this country and the world. My impression is that John does not think it is necessary to compromise on anything. I believe and maybe others agree that getting 80% is better than insisting on 100% and ending up with little. The democrats attack of painting republicans with the brush of unwilling to compromise has been successful at convincing the average dumb american that republicans are bad. While I am not willing to change my core beliefs I am will to change the tone of my rhetoric if it means winning the argument. My question is can the conservative movement make more of an advance by plain speaking the truth about where we are and what we want, or can the conservative movement make more of an advance by hiding or couching our agenda as the democrats have done so successfully? Democrats are winning. What will change that?