Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: skinowski who wrote (464008)	1/7/2012 7:00:11 PM
From: Bearcatbob	1 Recommendation Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 793914

Obama could take all of the money from the 1% and then have an even bigger mess. When the money is to be had it will be coming from everyone. Perhaps then people will question horse poop like Solyndra. My personal email addendum is "the only change is who loots the treasury". Team Obama are master looters.

To: skinowski who wrote (464008)	1/7/2012 9:03:37 PM
From: Stan	2 Recommendations Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 793914

This points to the greater problem, the really big one -- the population has been corrupted. That bothers me about the system. Since a democracy elects by the voice of the people, it's doomed when the people's desires go bad. That is why I don't have any trust in whomever gets into office, for they are elected to represent the people's corruption. If there is such as thing as a voting majority who are decent, they're worse if they let the greedy voices out-vote them.