SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : BORL: Time to BUY! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Linda Kaplan who wrote (7640)11/21/1997 12:06:00 PM
From: Jack Gibson  Respond to of 10836
 
Linda: I'm sure Neil will give you an answer (probably a better one than mine), but here is my 2 cents. Its hard to figure the value of VSGN. If you look at numbers alone, the deal looks awful. They have lost big bucks for such a small company ....for two years in
as row. Around 30 mil I think. But I dont think Yocam was concerned
about that. He was buying technology.....very good technology(
apparently.....this thread seems to think so), a VERY strong customer/
partnership base, and an acknowledged brain (Sippl). How do you
compute a value of these kinds of assets? I dont know, but I do know that the entire computer industry regards "brainpower" as
their strongest asset........an asset that doesn't show up on a balance
sheet. A strong customer base is damned important. And opening
up a new area of business(which, evidently, this acquisition does)
is of inestimable value. So, who knows? I think you have to dance with what brung you.....and that is Del Yocam. I think the most im-
portant question is: HOW LONG WILL IT TAKE TO ASSIMILATE
ALL OF THESE ASSETS, AND TURN THEM INTO BOTTOM LINE
RESULTS? My guess is about 3 quarters, maybe 4. I just hope the
stock price can regain a little momentum during the near term. Sure
would like to convert my 99 15's into 00 15's.
Cheers and luck to all,
Jack Gibson



To: Linda Kaplan who wrote (7640)11/21/1997 9:04:00 PM
From: Neil Booth  Respond to of 10836
 
Linda,

I take back what I said about dilution. I now think 100% -> 50% is 100% dilution (and 100% -> 25% is 300% dilution etc.).

So dilution (purely in terms of no. of shares) is 24/76 = 31.5%.

However, I think David was right; for a meaningful idea you need to take account of earnings effects etc., for which I have no idea.

Neil.