Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: fastpathguru who wrote (268959)	1/9/2012 2:54:28 PM
From: Mahmoud Mohammed	Respond to of 275872

Mr Guru, Re: "... You know, stuff that they could substantiate in court if need be." Spoken like a true "AMDroid" ... Judge, Jury and Executioner all "rolled into one". Sorry Guru, it doesn't work that way. (no link needed on that one) Mahmoud

To: fastpathguru who wrote (268959)	1/9/2012 2:55:50 PM
From: Elmer Phud	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 275872

Actually, these are not* allegations. They're descriptions of evidence that the allegations (i.e. CLAIMS) are based upon. You know, stuff that they could substantiate in court if need be.* Evidence that could be presented in Court. You don't know if it could be substantiated. It has not stood up to cross examination, nor has it withstood exculpatory evidence that could be presented in defense, not that that would be of any interest to you. So, as usual, you are presenting one side of the story as though it was the whole story. It's not. Fortunately, there are two sides. That's why your side is called an unproven allegation.