To: HPilot who wrote (63875 ) 1/10/2012 3:01:14 PM From: longnshort 1 Recommendation Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 103300 Position of modern scholarship (indigenous origin) Main article: Population history of Egypt Modern scholars who have studied Ancient Egyptian culture and population history have responded to the controversy over the race of the Ancient Egyptians in different ways. The focus of some experts who study population biology has been to consider whether or not the Ancient Egyptians were primarily biologically African rather than to which race they belonged. [110] It is now largely agreed that Dynastic Egyptians were indigenous to the Nile area. About 5,000 years ago the Sahara area dried out, and part of the Saharan population retreated East towards the Nile Valley. In addition Neolithic farmers from the Near East entered the Nile Valley, bringing with them their food crops, sheep, goats and cattle. [111] [112] Fekri Hassan and Edwin et al. point to mutual influence from both inner Africa as well as the Levant. [113] Dynastic Egyptians referred to their country as “The Two Lands”. During the Predynastic period (about 4800 to 4300BC) the Merimde culture flourished in the northern part of Egypt ( Lower Egypt ). [114] This culture, among others, has links to the Levant . [115] The pottery of the later Buto Maadi culture, best known from the site at Maadi near Cairo, also shows connections to the southern Levant . [116] In the southern part of Egypt ( Upper Egypt ) the predynastic Badarian culture was followed by the Naqada culture . These people seem to be more closely related to the Nubians and East Africans than with northern Egyptians. [117] [118] Due to its geographical location at the crossroads of several major cultural areas, Egypt has experienced a number of foreign invasions during historical times, including by the Canaanites , the Libyans , the Nubians , the Assyrians , the Kushites , the Persians , the Greeks , the Macedonians , the Romans , the Arabs and the Ottoman Turks . UNESCO convened the "Symposium on the Peopling of Ancient Egypt and the Deciphering of the Meroitic Script" in Cairo in 1974. At that forum the "Black Egyptian" theory was rejected by 90% of delegates, [105] [106] and the symposium concluded that Ancient Egyptians were much the same as modern Egyptians. In 1987 Martin Bernal produced the work “ Black Athena : The Afroasiatic Roots of Classical Civilization”, in which he argued inter alia that the society of Ancient Greece was heavily influenced by Ancient Egypt, and that the roots of Ancient Greece were thus “black”. The claims made in Black Athena were heavily questioned by Mary Lefkowitz , Professor Emerita of Classical Studies at Wellesley College in Massachusetts, in her book Not Out of Africa: How Afrocentrism Became an Excuse to Teach Myth As History. The criticisms were further developed inter alia in Black Athena Revisited (1996), a collection of essays edited by Mary Lefkowitz , and her colleague Guy MacLean Rogers. [119] [120] Other vocal critics include Egyptologist John D. Ray [121] , and Egyptologist James Weinstein [122] . In 2001 Bernal published "Black Athena Writes Back: Martin Bernal Responds to Critics" as a response to criticism of his earlier works. In 1996, the Indianapolis Museum of Art published a collection of essays, which included contributions from leading experts in various fields including archaeology , art history , physical anthropology , African studies , Egyptology , Afrocentric studies, linguistics , and classical studies . While the contributors differed in some opinions, the consensus of the authors was that Ancient Egypt was an African civilization, based on Egypt's geographic location on the African continent. [123]