SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: carranza2 who wrote (85774)1/11/2012 9:34:24 AM
From: TobagoJack1 Recommendation  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 217662
 
Heart-warming news, that re china n demand for gold, n transfer of same from weak to strong hands.

I was mentioning only a few weeks ago to someone Message 27847166 :0) on this thread that I have no reason to believe the rubbish about a decrease in demand for gold out of china, that which is a china play as well as a hedge for all other china plays

Just in in-tray, some says we shall be rewarded for our strong faith, and soon enough. My comment, it is enough to know we shall be rewarded, as long as w/i this year, cannot fret over when.

Gold Will Make a New High on This Date

By Jeff Clark, BIG GOLD

Some investors are frustrated and a few are worried that gold seems stuck in a rut. This stall in price has happened before, of course, but since 2001 it's always eventually powered to a new high. Unless one thinks the gold bull market is over, it's natural to wonder how long might we have to wait before seeing another new high.

Absent some sort of global shock that sparks another rush into gold (easily possible in today's climate), I think the answer may lie in examining the size and length of past corrections and how long it took gold to reach new highs afterward.

It makes sense that big corrections would take longer to reach new highs than small ones, but I wanted to confirm that assumption with the data. I also wanted to determine if there were any patterns in past recoveries that would give us some clues that we can apply to today.

Gold set a record on September 5 at $1,895 an ounce (London PM Fix) and to date has fallen as low as $1,531 (December 29), a decline of 19.2%. In order to determine how long it might take to breach $1,895 again, I measured how long it took new highs to be mounted after big corrections in the past.

The following chart details three large corrections since 2001, and calculates how many weeks it took the gold price to a) breach the old high, and b) stay above that level.



(Click on image to enlarge)

As you can see, it took a significant amount of time for gold to forge new highs after big selloffs. And yes, the bigger the correction, the longer it took.

In 2006, after a total fall of 22.6%, it took a year and four months for gold to surpass its old high. After the 2008 meltdown, it was a year and six months later before gold hit a new record.

Our recent correction more closely resembles the one in 2003. After a 16.2% drop, gold matched the old high seven months later. It took another two months to stay above it.

So when do we reach a new high in the gold price?

Let's apply the same ratio from the 2003 correction and recovery: If it took 29 weeks and four days to reach a new high after a 16.2% correction, a 19.2% pullback would take 35 weeks and 0 days. That works out to Thursday, August 30, 2012.

An exact date is pure conjecture, of course. On one hand, gold could drop below the $1,531 low if the need for cash and liquidity forces large investors to resume selling (forcing us to restart the "recovery clock"). On the other hand, Europe and/or the US could resume money printing on a large scale and send gold soaring overnight. The point of the data is that it signals we shouldn't be too surprised if we don't hit $1,900 for seven to eight months yet.

Think that's too long? There are some important reasons to not let it discourage you...

Once gold breaches its old high, you'll probably never be able to buy it at current prices again.

That's a rather obvious statement, but let it sink in. Buying now at $1,600 and then watching the price fall to, say, $1,500, wouldn't be fun - but it'll probably hit $2,000 or higher before the year's over, never to visit the $1,600s again this cycle. If that turns out to be correct, the next seven to eight months will be the very last time you can buy at these levels. You'll have to pay a higher price from then on.

Look at it this way: If the "rebound ratio" is similar to the one in 2003, you have 7.5 months and counting to buy whatever gold you want before it's no longer on sale. It's entirely possible that by this time next year you will never again be able to buy gold for less than $2,000 an ounce - unless maybe it's in "new dollars" or some other currency that circulates with fewer zeros on the notes.

The data can also help you ignore the noise about gold's bull market being over and other nonsense spewed from mainstream media types. If gold doesn't hit $1,900 until August, you'll know this is simply normal price behavior and that they're overlooking basic patterns in the data. And when September rolls around - seasonally the strongest month of the year for gold - and the price is climbing relentlessly and they're caught off guard by it, you'll already be positioned.

Regardless of the date, we're confident that a new high in the gold price will come at some point, because many major currencies are unsound and overburdened with debt - and they're all fiat and subject to government tinkering and mismanagement. Indeed, the ultimate high could be frighteningly higher than current levels. As such, we suggest taking advantage of prices that won't be available indefinitely.

After all, you don't want to be left without enough of nature's cure for man's monetary ills.

[The government's reckless monetary policies not only devalue the dollar, they erode the value of all the money in your bank account. This is nothing short of stealing, and it's only going to get worse].