Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : The Obama - Clinton Disaster -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: joseffy who wrote (64091)	1/12/2012 3:42:14 PM
From: DuckTapeSunroof	Respond to of 103300

This entire 'pro forma session' con game was invented by Senator Reid and only first used in 2007 to throw a spanner into President Bush's recess appointments? (You do know that don't you?) So, knowing that... you still so sure that it's "constitutional" and that the courts will say it is????????????? This is what the Courts are for settling! --------------------------------------------------- ...The Department of Justice released its legal opinion Thursday advising White House counsel that President Obama had legal authority to make the recess appointment of Richard Cordray as director of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau. "Although the Senate will have held pro forma sessions regularly from Jan. 3 through Jan. 23, in our judgment, those sessions do not interrupt the intrasession recess in a manner that would preclude the president from determining that the Senate remains unavailable throughout to 'receive communications from the President or participate as a body in making appointments," the DOJ said in the opinion. Obama made the recess appointment on Jan. 4. Senate Republicans blocked a vote on the nominee since July, demanding reforms for the bureau. Instead of a single director, they wanted a five-member commission, Congressional control of the CFPB budget and to make it easier for an oversight council to veto any bureau rules. Beginning in 2007, the Senate held these pro forma sessions that last only a few seconds and require the presence of just one Senator. Orders adopted by unanimous consent show that there will be no business conducted during these sessions. Instead, they're merely used to break up a longer recess in Congress into sections deemed by some to be too short to be considered an actual "recess," according to the opinion. But because some Senators have publicly stated they do not consider pro forma sessions to interrupt a recess, it therefore isn't a unanimous consent. The DOJ said precedent shows that convening during these periodic pro forma sessions in which no business is conducted "does not have the legal effect of interrupting an intrasession recess otherwise long enough to qualify as a 'Recess of the Senate' under the Recess Appointments Clause." Recess appointments occurred as far back the George Washington administration, and by 1943 it had become almost routine, according to the opinion. When it comes to making recess appointments while the pro forma sessions were ongoing, the DOJ said communications between the executive branch and the Senate are not formally conducted and even the Senate itself sets aside its own nominations even though pro forma sessions are ongoing. "In this context, the president therefore has discretion to conclude that the Senate is unavailable to perform its advise-and-consent function and to exercise his power to make recess appointments," the DOJ concluded. Message 27877487