Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : View from the Center and Left -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Win Smith who wrote (179238)	1/13/2012 3:24:08 PM
From: Bread Upon The Water	Respond to of 541866

Thanks for the website--I'll check it out as to the doc. The line ("just a conclusion") is my own based on what was included (or not included as it turns out) in the story.

To: Win Smith who wrote (179238)	1/13/2012 3:53:09 PM
From: Bread Upon The Water	Respond to of 541866

Scanned about the first 8 pages. And it"s, IMHO, a grey area of law that is going to provide a lot of midnight oil burning for Federal judges law clerk's. It's probably going to come down on a judge's or judges', as the case may be, view of how the powers of the different governmental branches should be exercised under the U.S. Constitution. Lot of opinions of the Atty General cited for buttressing the admin's conclusion (that the President can act as he did), but in the legal arena, while better than nothing, they are not of controlling weight (usually) either. Of course, this is just my view of it and of course very preliminary (as it would have to be without reading the cited sources).