Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Mainstream Politics and Economics -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Murrey Walker who wrote (6863)	1/13/2012 10:22:03 PM
From: koan	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 85487

<<He, like the partisans of the echo chamber refuse to acknowledge, that most will agree to SOME aspect of AGW.>> I saw it. So lets take what you said apart logically: "most will agree to some aspect of AGW." Not on the right. They say in general, it is just normal climate variation. I don't hear any "some" talk. But let's assume they do acknowledge SOME degree of AGW. Now that becomes important, because now it is a matter of "how much", not if! And if it is as much as the scientists are telling us it is, and why would we START by disbelieveing them?; and connect that with what we are seeing, like hundred thousand year variations and reductions in arctic and antarctic sea ice; and then even only having a 10% chance of all this being as clataclysmic as the preponderance of scientist say it is, then we need to friggen well do something about it just based on the odds and common sense-lol.