Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: tejek who wrote (465256)	1/15/2012 4:36:53 PM
From: Jorj X Mckie	15 Recommendations Respond to of 793964

Uh..........those practices developed under Bush who was clearly way over his head when he became president. In fact, he is the proverbial gift that does not stop giving. So sorry. The fact is, Bush had no idea those things were happening. They certainly weren't policy. But he took responsibility because it happened under his watch. Obama has been in office for three years. That's plenty of time for his influence to have permeated throughout the military. If you can hold Bush responsible for Abu Ghraib, then you must hold Obama responsible for soldiers urinating on enemy corpses. Anything less is disingenuous and intellectually dishonest.