SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Liberalism: Do You Agree We've Had Enough of It? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (121794)1/16/2012 4:18:42 PM
From: Carolyn4 Recommendations  Respond to of 224750
 
What about all those czars? Solyndra loans? Guns to crooks?



To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (121794)1/16/2012 5:19:17 PM
From: TideGlider6 Recommendations  Respond to of 224750
 
The greatest increase in Bush spending was in the last year of his second term. What congress authorized that spending?



To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (121794)1/16/2012 6:58:02 PM
From: FJB6 Recommendations  Respond to of 224750
 



To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (121794)1/16/2012 8:37:46 PM
From: tonto6 Recommendations  Respond to of 224750
 
Obama lied about shovel ready jobs. We know that and we also know that unemployed remained so purposely because of the Obama administration.



To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (121794)1/16/2012 9:16:54 PM
From: tonto2 Recommendations  Respond to of 224750
 
Oh for the good old days when Kenneth complained about $38 a barrel oil...Obama threatens military action against Iran...$110 oil and silence...it is destroying our recovery.

Soaring Oil Prices: Another Culprit?
The threat of war in IRAQ and this year's cold winter aren't the only reasons for sky-high oil and gas prices
By ADAM ZAGORIN

MARCI STENBERG/MERCED SUN-STAR/AP
GAS IN CALIFORNIA: The pain grows

Monday, Mar. 10, 2003
What's responsible for sky-high oil and gasoline prices? To the threat of war in IRAQ and this year's cold winter, add another culprit: the Administration's oil policies. That's the charge in a new Senate report produced by Democrat Carl Levin of Michigan. After 9/11, Bush developed a plan to fill the Strategic Petroleum Reserve (SPR), a 700 million — bbl. store meant to sustain the U.S. in an emergency. Last year 40 million bbl. were added to the SPR. The report states those purchases drove up prices by adding to the demand for oil. An independent analyst says that had the Administration not acted, oil would be selling for just $28 per bbl. instead of its current price of nearly $38 per bbl. and gas would be 35¢ per gal. lower. The government oil-buying binge has not even increased the supply of available oil, the report claims, since most of the petroleum added to the SPR was bought from private refiners, which have not replenished their stocks because of high prices.

The Bush Administration argues that the purchases were essential for national security and too small to affect prices. But the Senate report uncovered internal memos from the Energy Department warning of the plan's potential adverse impact. Sources tell TIME that Senate investigators have asked for additional documents on the purchases, but the Administration has refused because they contain communications with the White House. The last time CONGRESS asked for energy-related documents, Vice President Dick Cheney refused to hand them over, claiming Executive privilege.

From the Mar. 17, 2003 issue of TIME magazine

time.com



To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (121794)1/16/2012 9:27:53 PM
From: Hope Praytochange1 Recommendation  Respond to of 224750
 



To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (121794)1/16/2012 9:28:39 PM
From: Hope Praytochange  Respond to of 224750
 
Global Warming



To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (121794)1/16/2012 10:03:14 PM
From: lorne10 Recommendations  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 224750
 
ken....Ole Newt got what looked like a standing ovation at the debate....he would tear obama to pieces in a debate, make him look like what he really is...a little community organizer..sure would be fun to watch.... obama totally rattled and lose his phony cool. :-) wouldn't that be fun ken? :-)



To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (121794)1/17/2012 10:59:03 AM
From: Hope Praytochange2 Recommendations  Respond to of 224750
 


No. 15: Wilcox County, Ala.

Poverty rate: 39.6%

Poverty rate of children under 18: 52.5%

Median household income: $21,611

About half of the counties on this list are located in the South, where the jobless rate is higher than the national average, at more than 9%. The median annual income of residents of this rural county between Montgomery and Mobile is less than half of the national median income. In addition, the county's high school graduation rate of 71.1% trails Alabama's 80.8% average.



To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (121794)1/17/2012 11:00:02 AM
From: Hope Praytochange2 Recommendations  Respond to of 224750
 
No. 14: Maverick County, Texas

Poverty rate: 39.9%

Poverty rate of children under 18: 53.2%

Median household income: $27,710

This county borders Mexico and is home to 54,000 people, one-third of whom are under 18. Only 53.7% of Maverick's residents have graduated from high school, compared with 79.3% for Texas. And only 14% have graduated from college, compared with the state's 25.4%.



To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (121794)1/17/2012 11:01:11 AM
From: Hope Praytochange2 Recommendations  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 224750
 


No. 2: Todd County, S.D.

Poverty rate: 49.1%

Poverty rate of children under 18: 58.1%

Median household income: $26,393

Todd County shot up from being the sixth poorest county in 2009 to the second poorest in 2010, thanks to a 4 percentage point increase in the proportion of residents that live below the poverty line.