SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Mainstream Politics and Economics -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Wharf Rat who wrote (6983)1/17/2012 11:29:35 AM
From: Sdgla5 Recommendations  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 85487
 
The trend is a cooling one wharf....

And change is the norm.



To: Wharf Rat who wrote (6983)1/17/2012 11:36:42 AM
From: Murrey Walker1 Recommendation  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 85487
 
Wharfster, you and I are not going to go back and forth (my decision).

Let's leave it at this: You can move to RURAL China and enjoy the benefits of the NEW green developed China, WRT climate change and alternative energy. BUT, I really don't think you're going to enjoy the freshest of air. And don't count on the air conditioning (it does get warm there).

Me? I'll just tough it out here in rural America, and see what kind of running (not flip flop) shoes Mitt will wear in the White House. ;-)



To: Wharf Rat who wrote (6983)1/19/2012 11:30:28 AM
From: Wharf Rat  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 85487
 


Figure 1: Net human and natural percent contributions to the observed global surface warming over the past 50-65 years according to Tett et al. 2000 (T00, dark blue), Meehl et al. 2004 (M04, red), Stone et al. 2007 (S07, green), Lean and Rind 2008 (LR08, purple), Huber and Knutti 2011 (HK11, light blue), and Gillett et al. 2012 (G12, orange). This has been added to the SkS Climate Graphics Page.

skepticalscience.com