SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: LindyBill who wrote (465503)1/17/2012 1:09:21 PM
From: Maurice Winn1 Recommendation  Respond to of 793970
 
Yes and the energy that releases for creative enterprise is fantastic: < It took 90% of our population to feed us back in 1776. Now it takes 3%. > With billions working on millions of new things, fed by those 3%, instead of a few hundred thousand doing the heavy intellectual lifting a century or two ago when nearly everyone had to simply work at agriculture for a living, the rate of development is fantastic. Combine that with the Flynn Effect and synergy across borders and the speed of Cyberspace enabling those billions to do more faster and access Google instantly, the sky's the limit.

Yet people have managed to get in a mess of debt and recrimination with economic foundering as Big Brother bleeds those billions dry.

Mqurice



To: LindyBill who wrote (465503)1/17/2012 3:51:25 PM
From: goldworldnet3 Recommendations  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 793970
 
They may be American companies, but most of the labor is done overseas. The steel and cotton industry are all but dead and most finished products bought in US stores are manufactured in China or Korea. I don't agree with the position that this is good for America and by no stretch of the imagination can it be called self sufficient which is a national quality I consider of high importance.

* * *