SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Fast and Furious-----Obama/Holder Gun Running Scandal -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Carolyn who wrote (236)1/20/2012 4:56:59 PM
From: joseffy2 Recommendations  Respond to of 749
 
Holder, Breuer connected to players in foreclosure fraud?

(Did DOJ heads represent fraudsters?)

JANUARY 20, 2012 | ED MORRISSEY
hotair.com

For years, the Left has asked why the Obama administration hasn’t pursued prosecutions against lenders who arguably engaged in fraud when foreclosing on mortgages in the wake of the housing-bubble collapse. It turns out that these lenders had friends in high places in the Department of Justice. Reuters reports that both Attorney General Eric Holder and his lieutenant Lanny Breuer, who ran the DoJ’s criminal division, were partners in a law firm that worked on behalf of those very same firms (via JWF’s Just A Grunt):

U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder and Lanny Breuer, head of the Justice Department’s criminal division, were partners for years at a Washington law firm that represented a Who’s Who of big banks and other companies at the center of alleged foreclosure fraud, a Reuters inquiry shows.

The firm, Covington & Burling, is one of Washington’s biggest white shoe law firms. Law professors and other federal ethics experts said that federal conflict of interest rules required Holder and Breuer to recuse themselves from any Justice Department decisions relating to law firm clients they personally had done work for.

Both the Justice Department and Covington declined to say if either official had personally worked on matters for the big mortgage industry clients. Justice Department spokeswoman Tracy Schmaler said Holder and Breuer had complied fully with conflict of interest regulations, but she declined to say if they had recused themselves from any matters related to the former clients.

Holder and Breuer aren’t alone. Reuters lists a couple more former Covingtom & Burling associates at the DoJ that have since returned to their law practice, including Holder’s deputy chief of staff John Garland and Breuer’s deputy chief of staff Steven Fagell. The law firm itself lists almost two dozen former attorneys now working in the DoJ and another dozen in US Attorney offices around the country. That’s quite an impressive footprint of influence for Covington & Burling, and a valuable one for its clientele.

It’s not as if the fraud was particularly esoteric, either. Reuters began its own reporting on massive numbers of forged endorsements, part of the robo-signing scandal that halted foreclosure processing for more than a year. Those forgeries got submitted to courts on many occasions as part of the foreclosure process. Despite this, Holder has done nothing — at least publicly — to press an investigation into these forgeries, and as Reuters reports today, more are on their way:

Recent calls for a wide-ranging criminal investigation of the mortgage servicing industry have come from members of Congress, including Senator Maria Cantwell, D-Wash., state officials, and county clerks. In recent months clerks from around the country have examined mortgage and foreclosure records filed with them and reported finding high percentages of apparently fraudulent documents.

On Wednesday, John O’Brien Jr., register of deeds in Salem, Mass., announced that he had sent 31,897 allegedly fraudulent foreclosure-related documents to Holder. O’Brien said he asked for a criminal investigation of servicers and their law firms that had filed the documents because they “show a pattern of fraud,” forgery and false notarizations.

I suspect this information will animate the Left against Holder much more than Operation Fast & Furious, but both need extensive investigation. Perhaps this will be the straw that broke the camel’s back and convinces Barack Obama to get a new Attorney General. If not, Republicans and Democrats alike will have plenty of opportunity to ask Obama why his Department of Justice seems more interested in cover-ups and political machinations than in law enforcement.



To: Carolyn who wrote (236)2/2/2012 2:04:57 PM
From: joseffy  Respond to of 749
 
A failed ‘Fast and Furious’ whitewash

February 1, 2012 Michael A. Walsh
nypost.com

Today’s Capitol Hill hearing on the “Fast and Furious” mess promises drama that may well rival the 1954 Army-McCarthy hearings or gangland chieftain Frank Costello’s memorable 1951 testimony in front of Sen. Estes Kefauver’s hearings on organized crime.

Democrats on the House Oversight Committee insist there’s nothing left to learn about the murderous federal “gunwalking” operation: We already know who’s to blame, they report: low-level agents at the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives in Phoenix, and staffers at the US Attorney’s Office there, headed by Dennis Burke, who has since resigned.

Oh, yes, and George W. Bush.

That’s the pre-emptive whitewash released Tuesday by Rep. Elijah Cummings (D-Md.) and his partisan cronies in advance of the confrontation between the committee’s chairman, Rep. Darrell Issa (R-Calif.), and Attorney General Eric Holder — the man for whom the buck never stops as long as he can plausibly blame someone else.

“Operation Fast and Furious was the latest in a series of fatally flawed operations run by ATF agents in Phoenix and the US Attorney’s Office,” say committee Democrats. “Far from a strategy that was directed and planned by ‘the highest levels’ of the Department of Justice... the committee has obtained no evidence that Operation Fast and Furious was conceived or directed by high-level political appointees at Department of Justice headquarters.”

The operative words here are no evidence. That’s because Justice stubbornly refuses to provide any. Holder and his flunkies have spent more than a year evading, prevaricating, changing stories and outright stonewalling.

Citing that history, Issa wrote to the AG on Tuesday, “Your actions lead us to conclude that the department is actively engaged in a cover-up . . . If the department continues to obstruct the congressional inquiry . . . this committee will have no alternative but to move forward with [contempt proceedings].”

At issue is Holder’s outright refusal to turn over thousands of pages of internal documents on F&F. The AG has given some 80,000 pages of documents to Justice’s inspector general, which is conducting its own probe, but has only managed to send some 6,000 pages to Congress.

More, Holder told the House Judiciary Committee in testimony last December that his department will simply refuse to turn over any documents created after Feb. 4, 2011 — the date that Assistant Attorney General Ronald Weich categorically denied in a letter to Congress that ATF had ever allowed weapons to “walk” into Mexico. That letter was officially “withdrawn” in December — talk about evasion.

Among the documents that Justice refuses to share with the committee is an in-house “analytical review” by Deputy Assistant Attorney General Jason Weinstein, which included an interview with Patrick Cunningham — the Burke deputy who last month pleaded the Fifth rather than give a deposition to Issa’s investigators, and last week abruptly resigned.

No wonder Issa’s patience has just about run out.

By turns whiny, petulant and deceitful, Holder would rather accuse his critics of racism than substantively address the scandal. But with each “withdrawn” letter, Friday-night document dump and sudden resignation, it becomes ever more clear that the man who facilitated the outrageous Marc Rich pardon for President Bill Clinton is incapable of shame.

So the ludicrous Democratic report, “Fatally Flawed: Five Years of Gunwalking in Arizona” needs to be seen for what it is: a last-ditch attempt to cast blame on already fired subordinates and past administrations.

It won’t work. By trying to conflate Fast and Furious — where some 2,000 weapons were allowed to skate unsupervised across the Mexican border without notifying Mexican authorities — with Bush-era programs such as Operation Wide Receiver (which cooperated with the Mexicans and at least tried to trace the gun-running networks), the Democrats are simply blowing smoke.

The Democrats’ strategy is now clear: Keep fouling off pitches through Election Day. So tomorrow’s hearings won’t be the end of the matter; Issa needs to get more aggressive.

Earlier scandals like Watergate have laid out the prosecutorial template: Immunize the small fry and work your way up the chain of command until you find out where the buck stops. Now that Burke’s effectively been thrown under the bus, wouldn’t it be interesting to hear his side of the story — in public, and on live TV?

Read more: nypost.com



To: Carolyn who wrote (236)2/3/2012 12:49:51 AM
From: joseffy2 Recommendations  Respond to of 749
 
Holder to Puerto Rican Rep: 'Wherever you're from'

by David Freddoso February 2, 2012
campaign2012.washingtonexaminer.com

VIDEO

If you need confirmation that Republicans on the House Oversight committee got under Attorney General Eric Holder's skin today at the hearing on Fast and Furious, just look at this response he gave to Rep. Raul Labrador, R-Idaho, who grilled Holder about his own previous statements.

Specifically, note Holder's comment that "maybe this is the way you do things in Idaho, or wherever you're from."

Labrador, who is Puerto Rican, faced off in 2010 against a primary opponent who insisted in a debate that Puerto Rico is a foreign country.




To: Carolyn who wrote (236)2/3/2012 12:01:08 PM
From: joseffy  Respond to of 749
 
Covering Up Fast & Furiously

by
By RUSS VAUGHN
http://www.americanthinker.com/2012/02/covering_up_fast_furiously.html#ixzz1lKyDMxvo%3C/u%3E%3C/a%3E[/url]

The Fast and Furious investigation in Congress is becoming even more fast and furious with Congressional Chairman Issa threatening a contempt citation against Attorney General Eric Holder. Last week's Friday document dump by the DoJ once again added to the widely held belief that that the AG and his minions are hiding something from Congress and the American people, but what? Each of these Friday dumps has so far provided mounting evidence that the highest echelons of federal government were clued in to this ill-fated, probably criminal endeavor from the get-go. But while we are learning more and more with each disclosure as to the how's and when's of this fiasco, we are still completely in the dark as to the why?

Certainly, BATF and Justice have offered the rationale that this enterprise was designed to entrap the Mexican drug cartels by tracking weapons purchased in the U.S. to their criminal end users in Mexico. That would all sound quite plausible except for a key failing in the plan: there was no process in place for tracking the weapons once they crossed the border into Mexico. That process would have involved the notification and cooperation of the Mexican government because American BATF and DEA agents must be certified by that government to actively conduct operations within Mexico's borders. We now know for a certain fact that the Mexican government was not notified of this operation until it was blown. Furthermore, even the federal agents who were authorized to operate in Mexico were kept uninformed of this subterfuge until angry, rebellious BATF agents blew the whistle on their superiors.

That everyone south of the border was kept in the dark pretty much puts the lie to DoJ's latest red herring, that Deputy AG, Lanny Breuer, suggested to Mexican officials that straw buyers in the U.S. be allowed to cross into Mexico where they could be prosecuted under much tougher Mexican gun laws. The problem with that excuse is the timeline. Breuer's suggestion was made in February 2011, well after F&F had been in full operation for many months, without that supposed strategy being proposed to the Mexican government.

Now if you set a plan into motion that has no provision for achieving the stated goal of that plan, you most probably are in reality looking to achieve another goal, one that you prefer to remain hidden from oversight and exposure. Thus, if the firearms could not possibly be tracked, but our Justice Department had set up a secret arms conduit and allowed these weapons to continue to flow into Mexico, what could possibly have been the hidden agenda? Remember that this is the legal arm of the most politically leftist administration in the history of this country. Leftists are fervent supporters of gun control laws and do not believe the 2d Amendment gives American citizens the right to freely keep and bear arms. Remember as well that the chief executive, his chief of staff, his attorney general and even his secretary of state all have roots in Chicago, a city area with the most restrictive gun ownership laws in America, laws enacted by their Democrat cronies.

Keeping all that in mind, recall that shortly after this administration took office, we began to read and hear with increasing frequency from these same folks that American guns were responsible for 90% of the illegal firearms being captured from the drug cartels. While this claim was patently bogus for any number of reasons, it was trumpeted by the liberal media amid resurgent calls for stricter gun controls on this side of the border. After analysis and debunking by the NRA and others, the hysterical anti-gun enthusiasts quieted their claims and the issue faded into the background. That is, until Operation Fast and Furious was blown wide open by those brave BATF agents.

Consider then that the same administration that was publicly blaming lax American gun laws for providing arms to the murderous cartels was the same administration conducting a secret operation to funnel even more guns into Mexico. The question remains: Why? It is interesting to note that no less than the former Director of the CIA, General Michael V. Hayden, had this to say in a CNN article about Holder and this scandal:

"Now Holder, without such safeguards in place, must defend himself against some very tough accusations, including one by some skeptics that the operation was intended principally to discredit, and thereby justify further regulation of, firearms dealers."

Reading that, from one of the top intelligence minds in the world, has to make one wonder. Why, while diverting the claim away from himself by attributing the belief to some skeptics, did the former director of the CIA drop that bit of speculation into the mix? Do you seriously believe that a man of his stature and inside connections would raise the question purely gratuitously?

Details of Operation Fast & Furious, with the revelations of all the deaths caused by this incredibly stupid federal program are infuriating enough; but they are nothing compared to the fury that will engulf tens of millions of citizens when they finally learn the truth: that the Obama Administration secretively and criminally used the Justice Department to further a liberal Democrat agenda to curtail the constitutional right to keep and bear arms. Trust me, they know and fear that reaction should the truth ever see light. Not only could that revelation prevent any chance of re-election, it could also result in multiple impeachments and criminal indictments, because hundreds of Mexicans and some American agents died as the result of a foolishly conceived and stupidly implemented liberal political scheme to undermine the constitution.

It helps to remember that on March 30th, 2011, our chief executive, President of the United States and head of the Democratic Party said this to a gathering of anti-gun activists during a 30th anniversary of the Reagan assassination attempt, when questioned about his activities regarding imposition of stricter gun control laws:

"I just want you to know that we are working on it," Brady recalled the president telling them. "We have to go through a few processes, but under the radar." (emphasis added)



Under the radar, indeed, and across the Mexican border as well; and therein lies the rationale for the furious Fast & Furious cover-up now underway.