SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : The Obama - Clinton Disaster -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Bill who wrote (64599)1/19/2012 11:58:23 PM
From: Honey_Bee  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 103300
 
Thank you for sharing that. I have become more and more inclined to think he would make a great candidate.

I would like to see him come out swinging just a little harder against attacks (in debates), but Gingrich is so good at it, maybe best he not try to compete with him in that way.



To: Bill who wrote (64599)1/21/2012 8:50:22 AM
From: Peter Dierks4 Recommendations  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 103300
 
I visited with my father yesterday about Romney. Romney has a lot of good about him. I will not abstain if he is the nominee.

I was pulling for Gingrich. It is rumored that Newt had affairs with his second and third wives while still married to his first and second wives respectively. He has not lied under oath about them so he is not a perjurer like Clinton. If it true I don't really want to make that kind of compromise on moral leadership.

Santorum has pointed out that he was one of the authors of the last healthcare reform to help small business owners. OTOH he couldn't get reelected with the support of a still popular President Bush 43.

It is good to hear these positives about Romney. The fact that he is a member of a sect bothered me, but even a sect member is a huge improvement over the ethics of what is in power now.

I guess if Romney's liberalism and political flip flopping is the cost to get true fiscal conservatism, it is a price worth bearing.