SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Jeff Fox who wrote (40915)11/21/1997 4:34:00 PM
From: Paul Engel  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 186894
 
Jeff - Re: " Intel selected RMBS. Without this endorsement nobody would be looking at it for PC memory."

Very good assessment of the Rambus/Intel relationship.

I suspect that most of what you posted is correct - Intel could have picked any other memory manufacturer/technology to support. Instead, it went with a technology-only compaany - RAMBUS - placing its own (Intel's) reputation on the line.

I'm sure Intel is not paying for this "privilege".

Paul



To: Jeff Fox who wrote (40915)11/21/1997 10:14:00 PM
From: mauser96  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 186894
 
Since Intel owns a good bit of Rambus, in a way Intel is Rambus.
Rambus would be smart if it keeps it's royalties low enough so that there is no real pressure to develop competing technology. I understand royalties to DRAM makers will be in the 1% to 2% range.



To: Jeff Fox who wrote (40915)11/22/1997 8:16:00 AM
From: Road Walker  Respond to of 186894
 
Jeff,

I heard somewhere that the Rambus royalty would be about 2%, still a huge amount IF Rambus becomes the de facto standard.

John