SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: steve harris who wrote (643376)1/23/2012 7:11:44 PM
From: joseffy2 Recommendations  Respond to of 1578371
 
Crooked Recall petitions by Democrats in Wisconsin

Galloway Recall Petitions Show Duplicates, Invalid Signatures, Circulator Mistakes


By Collin Roth
mediatrackers.org

Yesterday, Media Trackers reported that an initial naked eye look at a sampling of recall petitions turned in for Senator Pam Galloway showed numerous duplicates, invalid signatures, and circulator mistakes. Below is a brief accounting of the errors with screenshots of just a few pages that could throw out 24 of 37 signatures:

  • Two petition sheets were turned in that were identical (pages 1484 and 1485). One was for the Walker recall and one for the Galloway recall. While perhaps a mistake, instances like this pad the numbers for initial reports of recall signatures.
  • Pages 4701-B and 4703 are also identical.
  • Pages 4705 is a copy of 1584.
  • On pages 4706-A, 4707, and 4709 the circulator failed to sign and a total of six signatures should be deemed invalid.
  • Pages 4711 and 4714 show the circulator failing to print name and address.
  • Page 4706-B shows an individual signing after the circulator has signed and dated the page.
  • Page 4710 shows both a signer and circulator failing to date the petition page.
  • While some may deem these as inconsequential mistakes and errors, it is a reflection of a sloppy process accompanied by little oversight that failed to follow the proper procedures and guidelines outlined by the GAB.

    There is no doubt that these pages are hardly snowflakes on the tip of the iceberg as the recall verification process gets underway.




    To: steve harris who wrote (643376)1/23/2012 7:41:23 PM
    From: joseffy  Respond to of 1578371
     
    Lara Logan breaks silence on horrific rape ordeal in Egypt

    Lara Logan: Life is not about dwelling on the bad

    Exclusive Interview: CBS news star talks about PTSD, her recovery, her family, her work and the women that inspire her

    By Richard Huff / NEW YORK DAILY NEWS January 22 2012
    nydailynews.com

    "When I’m lying there, waiting for my daughter to go to sleep, I have time to think about things," says Lara Logan. "Those can be dark moments. You ranger through, you have to. You’re aware of how much you have and it’s so much more than what you’ve lost."

    Lara Logan is back on the air, she’s got nine stories in the works at “60 Minutes” and a new show set to launch — but she still battles the demons of a horrific gang sexual assault, even sometimes while she puts her young daughter to bed.

    “People don’t really know that much about (posttraumatic stress disorder),” she told the Daily News. “There’s something called latent PTSD. It manifests itself in different ways. I want to be free of it, but I’m not.

    “It doesn’t go away,” she said. “It’s not something I keep track of. It’s not predictable like that. But it happens more than I’d like.”

    Last Feb. 11, while covering the Egyptian uprisings in Cairo’s Tahrir Square, Logan was surrounded by an angry mob of men and ripped away from her CBS crew. She was viciously stripped and suffered a “brutal and sustained” sexual assault.

    “I didn’t even know that they were beating me with flagpoles and sticks and things, because the sexual assault was all I could feel, their hands raping me over and over and over again,” she told “60 Minutes” last spring.

    They tried to rip off chunks of her scalp.

    “I was in no doubt in my mind that I was in the process of dying,” she said.

    She was saved when a woman dressed all in black “put her arms around me,” and other women closed ranks around her until soldiers arrived.

    Since then, Logan told the News, she’s been putting her life back together with the help of family and friends.

    “Your family is critical,” said the married mother of two. “You can’t do it alone. My husband is a great support. He understands, he doesn’t hide from it, from what happened. He knows everything, more than anyone, what they did to me.”

    It’s not as if it’s a regular topic of conversation in the house, she said. But the issue does emerge from time to time.

    “My children are my life,” she said. “They’re so spectacular. They’re also so young.”

    Without knowing it, little Lola, who will be 2 in March, and Joseph, 3, helped her get through the aftermath of the attacks.

    “When I’m lying there, waiting for my daughter to go to sleep, I have time to think about things. Those can be dark moments. You ranger through, you have to. You’re aware of how much you have and it’s so much more than what you’ve lost. You have a responsibility. Life is not about dwelling on the bad.”

    CBS News chairman Jeff Fager, who is also the executive producer of “60 Minutes,” feared for Logan’s life.

    “She, really, in many ways should not have survived that attack,” Fager said. “I was looking at it from the worst-case scenario. When you heard her describe it, it seemed that way. I was concerned with her health and would she come back.”

    It wasn’t until a visit at Logan’s home about two months later that he knew she would be okay, that the spark that was missing early on was alive again.

    “She’s one of the toughest people I’ve ever known and determined in every way,” he said.

    But even with a positive attitude, healing can be difficult.

    “Living with it for the long haul is a different thing than trying to pick yourself up in the initial aftermath,” Logan said. “I thought it was going to be a lot easier than it really is. It was very clear from the first moment, I was not ashamed to talk about it. I knew I could deal with it. I knew I would be okay, ultimately.”

    As a journalist, she said, she’s always felt like she could connect with viewers — with people — in a real way.

    Now, some of them talk to her about their own sexual abuse. If anything, they might have a better sense of who she has become.

    Women she’s met all around the world — and those who have written her who have suffered similar incidents, if not far worse — have provided inspiration, too.

    “When people come up to me and they feel like they can talk about something so completely disturbing, how can I not be moved by that?”

    Her career, she said, is also a key component to overcoming the emotional and physical trauma. From the start, her bosses at CBS have let her come back at her own pace, something for which she’s immensely grateful. “CBS is not holding me back, but they’re not forcing me forward,” she said.

    Besides “60 Minutes” and reporting for the “CBS Evening News with Scott Pelley,” Logan is co-hosting CBS’ revival this year of “Person to Person” with Charlie Rose, which returns Feb. 8 at 8 p.m.

    “She’s having a really good year,” Fager said, noting her work gets better on each piece.

    Though her role as a journalist hasn’t changed, how she does it these days has. She gives more consideration to safety when looking at story ideas. And, unlike earlier in her career when she would do an interview and fly out the next day, Logan travels overnight to be home with her children.

    “Whenever you make a decision to do a story or go to a difficult place, you look at all the factors and that’s how you decide, ‘Is it possible for me to go there,’ ” she said. “‘What makes sense, what’s smart,’ and I still get the story and do a smart thing.”

    The media has become a target in some places, for sure, and her name recognition after the attack could make going into some regions even more dangerous.

    One interview she’d been working on with a Taliban commander was deemed too risky for her to make the trip. She understands why those decisions have to be made, but doesn’t like the change.

    “It burns my ass, it does,” she said. “I’m also okay with it. I know that’s the right decision. Life is full of frustrations. You can’t do everything you want.”

    What keeps her going, she said, is the people she’s met along the way. She thinks about the strength it has taken others to go on after their families have been massacred. Or those who live in countries where they can’t speak out at all.

    She recalled one woman in Africa who was raped and disemboweled, who said she had to live because she wasn’t going to give her attackers everything.

    Lara Logan knows exactly how that woman felt, and that’s part of what drives her today. She refuses to be defined by the attack.

    “Goddamnit,” Logan said, “I’m not going to give them everything.”


    Read more: nydailynews.com






    To: steve harris who wrote (643376)1/23/2012 9:54:20 PM
    From: joseffy  Respond to of 1578371
     
    Despite Solyndra, Obama to Boost Green Energy

    January 23, 2012
    usnews.com

    With a Solyndra-scandal-be-damned attitude, President Obama is expected to revive his push for new green fuel sources in Tuesday's State of the Union address, claiming that they will boost jobs and help clean the environment.

    Industry sources who met with policy officials at the White House last week say the president will hint at an emerging administration plan to propose increased spending on green fuel sources and radical changes in how the government and Americans power machines in the future. [ See a collection of political cartoons on energy policy.]

    "He wants a huge, sweeping thing. He wants to do it all," said an industry source, who explained that the president's plan was sidelined by the Solyndra financing scandal. "They are trying to get the train back on track and it will probably start with the State of the Union," said the source.

    The focus on the State of the Union came late last year with the president's Office of Science and Technology Policy calling for white papers from green fuel firms. What Obama wants, according to the request, is for new ways to produce energy in "lean budget times," regulatory reforms that would speed up new development of green fuel plants and ideas to add environmentally-friendly jobs to the economy.

    Since then, the administration has rapidly ramped up its focus on green energy, announcing a plan for the Pentagon to start buying biofuel for jets and ships and several Agriculture Department initiatives to fund renewable energy projects.[ Follow the U.S. News Energy Intelligence blog on Twitter]

    "Look at the timing of all of this," said the industry source. "There are no coincidences when it comes to tying all of these green announcements and the president's speech together."




    To: steve harris who wrote (643376)1/24/2012 11:47:02 AM
    From: joseffy  Respond to of 1578371
     
    If that is Barack Obama’s idea of a true friend, then what does that say about his vision of America or the world?

    Obama’s Favorite Foreign Leader

    by Jonathan S. Tobin 1/23/2012
    commentarymagazine.com

    The Washington Post’s Jackson Diehl is a normally sober observer of foreign affairs so it’s a bit disappointing to see him writing today in defense of Turkey’s Islamic government. Diehl’s starting point was to debunk Rick Perry’s comment in last week’s debate in South Carolina in which the Texas governor claimed Turkey was run by “Islamic terrorists” and questioned its continuing presence in NATO. Of course, he’s right that the government of Recep Tayyip Erdogan is not quite the equivalent of Hamas or Hezbollah, but as Michael Rubin noted last week, it has became a major sponsor and enabler of terrorism. While Diehl makes the point that Turkey has been somewhat helpful to the U.S. on Libya and Syria, on the issues of Middle East peace and the threat from the Iranian nukes, it has been a disaster.

    Which is why I think the most distressing aspect of Diehl’s defense of Turkey as a reliable American ally is the fact that he says its leader has become one of the few foreign leaders with whom Barack Obama has a strong relationship. Obama has, according to the Post, spent more time speaking on the phone with Erdogan than any other ally. Indeed, in a cover story interview with Time Magazine, Obama told a fawning Fareed Zakaria that Erdogan was someone with whom he had become friends and forged “bonds of trust.”

    It speaks volumes about the deplorable state of American foreign policy that Erdogan is someone with whom Obama is most comfortable.

    Diehl’s main point is that Islamists are the “new normal” in the Arab and Islamic worlds. That may be true, but his optimism that groups like the Islamic parties that now control Egypt’s new parliament will turn out to be more like Turkey than Hamas or Iran seems not only naive but also underestimates the extent to which Erdogan has opposed American interests and values.

    Under the tutelage of Obama’s buddy, Turkish democracy is in a free fall with journalists and opponents of the ruling party being jailed. Abroad, Turkey has not only abandoned its long standing alliance with fellow American friend Israel but has become the leading supporter of the Hamas terrorist group on the international stage. Just as bad is Erdogan’s refusal to support the West on isolating Iran, providing Tehran with a reliable outlet for trade just at the time when the Europeans are out ahead of the U.S. on toughening sanctions.

    Any president who considered the alliance with Israel or the need to stop Iran’s drive for nuclear weapons as among our nation’s top foreign policy priorities would regard Erdogan as being, at best, a thorn in America’s side and, at worst, a genuine threat to our interests as well as our democratic values. But not Barack Obama.

    Obama has been open about his contempt and dislike for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. The Israeli is a prickly customer, and it may be that Erdogan is easier to like on a personal basis. But anyone wondering why relations with the Jewish state have become so tenuous in the last three years need only understand this is a White House where an Islamic quasi-authoritarian who backs Hamas is the president’s pal and the prime minister of Israel is his bête noire.

    Turkey may not be (as Rick Perry stated), run by a terrorist, but it is a nation that has been transformed under Erdogan from a faithful ally to a source of genuine concern on both the home and foreign fronts. If that is Barack Obama’s idea of a true friend, then what does that say about his vision of America or the world?