Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: goldworldnet who wrote (466932)	1/23/2012 8:54:45 PM
From: FJB	3 Recommendations Respond to of 793640

Crooked Recall petitions by Democrats in Wisconsin Galloway Recall Petitions Show Duplicates, Invalid Signatures, Circulator Mistakes By Collin Roth (from josefly) mediatrackers.org Yesterday, Media Trackers reported that an initial naked eye look at a sampling of recall petitions turned in for Senator Pam Galloway showed numerous duplicates, invalid signatures, and circulator mistakes. Below is a brief accounting of the errors with screenshots of just a few pages that could throw out 24 of 37 signatures: Two petition sheets were turned in that were identical (pages 1484 and 1485). One was for the Walker recall and one for the Galloway recall. While perhaps a mistake, instances like this pad the numbers for initial reports of recall signatures. Pages 4701-B and 4703 are also identical. Pages 4705 is a copy of 1584.On pages 4706-A, 4707, and 4709 the circulator failed to sign and a total of six signatures should be deemed invalid. Pages 4711 and 4714 show the circulator failing to print name and address. Page 4706-B shows an individual signing after the circulator has signed and dated the page. Page 4710 shows both a signer and circulator failing to date the petition page.There is no doubt that these pages are hardly snowflakes on the tip of the iceberg as the recall verification process gets underway. There is no doubt that these pages are hardly snowflakes on the tip of the iceberg as the recall verification process gets underway.

To: goldworldnet who wrote (466932)	1/23/2012 8:59:18 PM
From: MJ	4 Recommendations Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 793640

Just a gentle reminder that poll was in December a little over a month ago. Polls change regularly and also depends on who does the poll. The poll that matters is the one next November-----Obama Must Go

To: goldworldnet who wrote (466932)	1/23/2012 9:15:24 PM
From: greenspirit	3 Recommendations Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 793640

Thanks, interesting when the pundits talk about Newt's unfavorable ratings them never mention what Obama's are. Seems to me the key to winning is motivation to vote. For some reason Romney has a tough time engendering motivated voters. It remains to be seen whether Gingrich can maintain the momentum, but at this point he appears to be tapping into the motivation side of the electorate. If he keeps hammering the media at key moments, that will likely continue. Conservatives are sick of the biased media, especially after the grotesque fawning shiver going up my leg last Presidential election.