SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: simplicity who wrote (467280)1/25/2012 12:14:00 PM
From: Neeka2 Recommendations  Respond to of 793931
 
"Every person in here has known personal pain. Every person in here has had someone close to them go through painful things."

Hi simplicity,

I take Gingrich's first sentence to mean he is talking about himself as well as every (other) person to have experienced personal pain.............which I believe to be true..........although BO is a God so he wouldn't know (snark), and the second sentence to mean that we have all known someone else who has experienced pain and/or suffering. That is just how I interpret it. Marianne Gingrich has a look in her eyes that I have seen in people who suffer. It is a look of constant pain and worry that has been there for a very long time and is permanent.

I'm no doctor, so I could be completely wrong?

I like Rick Santorum too, and agree that it is sad and a shame that Americans have become so reticent they couldn't support as good a man as he, but you're right.............he won't get the nomination. If he was a bit older and wiser and experienced in the ways of campaigning, he might have caught fire?

You know I like Gingrich. IMO, he's the only one who I believe will radically change what is going on in WDC and truly understands that the power of this country rightfully belongs to its people, and I believe he will do what ever it takes to make sure that misallocated power is returned to its rightful owners.

Below is his response to last night's SOTU address.

January 25, 2012 • Vol. 7, No. 4

The Real State of the Union
by Newt Gingrich

Dear Fellow Conservative,

As a member of Congress I sat through 20 State of the Union addresses. I listened to Presidents Carter, Reagan, Bush and Clinton. Four of those I spent sitting behind the president as Speaker of the House.

During each of the four years I was speaker, it was President Clinton who delivered the State of the Union address.

I can tell you firsthand that it is very challenging to be the Republican Speaker of the House sitting directly behind a Democratic president as he delivers his biggest speech of the year. There are more pitfalls than you might imagine.

On the one hand, the speaker sitting behind the president has to be positive and polite because he (or she) is technically the host and represents the entire House. That is a nonpartisan responsibility.

On the other hand, I was, like Speaker Boehner last night, a Republican and a conservative who found a lot of what a liberal president said the opposite of what I believed. I couldn't be seen applauding or smiling while the president said things I opposed.

All this is made more complicated by two facts about State of the Union addresses.
r t

First, presidents try to find popular unifying statements which will bring the entire Congress to its feet on both sides of the aisle, and the speakers behind the president often find themselves standing and applauding him on national television simply because it wouldn't make sense to ignore these statements.

Yet second, the liberal president will almost certainly attack the Republican speaker's party, and will do so to the great excitement and enthusiasm of his fellow Democrats. If your face suggests that you're bothered by the president's attacks on your party, everyone will see your reaction on television. Few other people in the chamber have to think so much about what their faces are doing.

I know the State of the Union was always one of the hardest things I did. I suspect President Obama's ideological extremism makes it even harder for Speaker Boehner.

President Obama's class warfare, his commitment to raising taxes, increasing regulation and his failed ideology make his vision for America one of the most radical in our history. The vision he describes is for fundamentally changing our country.

I sure wouldn't want to sit behind him as he described that.

Your Friend,

Newt