Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Liberalism: Do You Agree We've Had Enough of It? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (122561)	1/26/2012 2:58:45 AM
From: tonto	3 Recommendations Respond to of 224718

Viewers down 12%. Very bad indicator.

To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (122561)	1/26/2012 7:41:19 AM
From: lorne	3 Recommendations Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 224718

Spilled milk: Obama's 'ridiculous interpretation' of regulation Rep. Louie Gohmert: 'Derelection of duty' will be felt far into future wnd.com In his State of the Union message, President Obama described the U.S. economy as on the rebound. He also tried to convince skeptics that he was being aggressive on developing domestic energy, rolling back burdensome regulations and working to reduce our national debt. But Rep. Louie Gohmert (R-Texas) tells WND the facts are far different from the rhetoric. “He has been slow walking the permits … and so he has the luxury of taking credit of for the drilling permits that were issued under Bush that are just now coming to fruition and bringing oil and gas to the market and unfortunately the damage his administartion has been doing through the Interior and EPA is going to be felt in the next administration.” Gohmert tells us who is really responsible for the recent surge in oil and natural gas production. He says the president is greatly increasing government regulations despite the language Obama used in the speech, and Gohmert also sheds some light on the milk regulation the Obama so proudly repealed. “It’s his administration that has caused that kind of ridiculous interpretation of old rules.” He also explains why he believes the president’s talk on spending and the national debt was either ignorant or deceptive. Listen to the interview here.

To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (122561)	1/26/2012 8:36:26 AM
From: TideGlider	1 Recommendation Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 224718

Don't forget to post the jobless claims...

To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (122561)	1/26/2012 8:41:40 AM
From: TideGlider	1 Recommendation Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 224718

That statistic doesn't actually tell how long people watched. For most it took a while before they found a station to tune on. Doesn't 5 minutes count? I don't know.

To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (122561)	1/26/2012 8:51:40 AM
From: locogringo	5 Recommendations Respond to of 224718

More people watched the football game on Sunday on ONE station, Fox, than ALL the people combined on ALL of the networks for his boring rerun BLAH speech. Makes ya proud, right kenny_troll? Even your pathetic spin is laughable.

To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (122561)	1/26/2012 8:55:30 AM
From: locogringo	8 Recommendations Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 224718

Is this what you mean by "PAYING YOUR FAIR SHARE"? 36 Obama aides owe $833,000 in back taxes How embarrassing this must be for President Obama, whose major speech theme so far this campaign season has been that every single American, no matter how rich, should pay their "fair share" of taxes. Or, worse, skipping their taxes altogether. news.investors.com Makes ya proud, doesn't it kenny_troll. Your ilk is really something.