Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : International Precious Metals (IPMCF) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: ddl who wrote (27994)	11/21/1997 7:16:00 PM
From: Larry Brubaker	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 35569

Denis: I think we already have our answer on that. Bateman said it is not commercial and the numbers are not relevant. So, it sounds to me like IPM may (or may not) have had a nice chemistry set process that extracted the kind of values they claimed, but not a process that could ever be used for mining. To me, the bigger misrepresentation is the Auric "repeatable" fire assay that ended up not being able to withstand the "rigor" of third party verification.