Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: longnshort who wrote (468217)	1/29/2012 3:46:32 PM
From: MulhollandDrive	2 Recommendations Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 793656

"We need somebody who is engaged in sudden and relentless reform and isn't afraid to shake up that establishment. So, if for no other reason, rage against the machine, vote for Newt; annoy a liberal, vote Newt. Keep this vetting process going, keep the debate going. As more debate happens, Judge, we'll hear more from Newt and the other candidates who will oppose his position, as he claims he's not part of the establishment, let's hear more about it," Palin said on Saturday evening. lol....annoy a LIBERAL? what is she smoking? liberals are frothing at the bit with pure glee at the prospect of a gingrich nomination.... i had some suspicion when she came out with the 'keep the debate going' statement....then she gave faint endorsement to santorum, now she is fully behind newt..... i'm convinced she is hoping for an obama win so she can run in 2016.... palin has truly jumped the shark

To: longnshort who wrote (468217)	1/29/2012 4:10:02 PM
From: Bill	1 Recommendation Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 793656

Why not just come out and endorse him? Why is she playing these childish games? Just endorse Gingrich, like many other pols have done.