Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: KLP who wrote (468286)	1/29/2012 9:02:07 PM
From: MulhollandDrive	4 Recommendations Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 793639

of course i think the candidates should be vetted. palin was one of the most UNVETTED candidates ever (before the election in a national campaign), a republican 'establishment' candidate gave her entre' into a place where she would have never even existed without it...i find her railing against 'establishment republicans' hypocritical to the extreme....she would just be a former alaskan governor with little to none political influence were it not for that ESTABLISHMENT she is demagogueing against romney ran in 2008 and i think he's been vetted more than ANY current candidate (including obama) palin is stoking the warfare inside the party and this has NOTHING to do with vetting she is trying to weaken romney.... she has no chance to run in 2016 if he wins obviously she is putting her own personal political fortunes ahead of what is good for the country