Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Alighieri who wrote (644039)	1/30/2012 11:29:16 AM
From: i-node	6 Recommendations Respond to of 1579367

>>> This from a man who voted for a 7T entitlement program without a penny of it being funded...go ahaed and change the subject again ten... It is interesting that a year ago, when I tried to explain MC & SS unfunded liabilities to you, you denied their existence. Now, today, when it suits your needs, you speak in terms of -- you guessed it -- unfunded liabilities -- in your case, in an effort to make the problem look as big as possible. The 7T from Part D is NOTHING WHEN COMPARED WITH THE UNFUNDED LIABILITIES FROM PARTS A, B, & C PLUS SS -- THE TRULY FAILED SOCIAL PROGRAMS OF FDR AND LBJ. Never mind that Obamacare was SUPPOSED to have "funded" Part D. Never mind that Obamcare massively increased the demand for money by Part D since it eliminated the donut hole, one of the key elements that made Part D such a fiscal success -- even if unfunded. No, you ignore Obama's role in this 7T liability choosing instead to blame, conveniently, persons whom you oppose. Pretty much two-faced, as you've always been.

To: Alighieri who wrote (644039)	1/30/2012 12:25:59 PM
From: Tenchusatsu	1 Recommendation Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1579367

Al, > This from a man who voted for a 7T entitlement program without a penny of it being funded...go ahaed and change the subject again ten... Ryan wants to reform entitlements. You're the one trying to misrepresent what he's doing as "leading the charge against entitlements." Straight out of the liberal playbook. Since when were you against new government spending without a penny of it being funded? The entire Obama presidency has been about that. Talk about "changing the subject," huh Al? The faux "hypocrisy" angle is a favorite red herring of libtards. Tenchusatsu