Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Apple Tankwatch -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: sylvester80 who wrote (16365)	1/31/2012 9:32:14 AM
From: rnsmth	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 32692

So, is it your positon that the carriers are horrible business people, making awful decisions?

To: sylvester80 who wrote (16365)	1/31/2012 9:40:39 AM
From: pyslent	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 32692

"How long before carriers realize that the iPhone is poison to them??" That's a very important point, one that I consider the one truly critical to Apple's incredible profitability and, more importantly to investors, to the sustainability of that profitability. I am always on the watch for any hint that the carriers are revolting against the "iPhone tax." So far, we have not seen decreased ASP, carriers switching away from offering the iPhone, carrier marketing trying to deprecating iPhone in favor of less subsidized devices, etc. On the one hand, it's fairly clear than $1980 in revenue over 2 years is worth a $400 up front payment. On the other hand, all things being equal, it's better to pay $200/250 to acquire a customer than $400. For now, some carriers obviously feel that the iPhone is delivering business they would not otherwise get. Also, I'll note that these rumored volume commitments cleverly aligns Apple and the carriers' interests. Worse than paying $400 for a customer is paying $650 for a phone that sits in a warehouse.