Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : The Obama - Clinton Disaster -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: DuckTapeSunroof who wrote (65294)	1/31/2012 5:05:57 PM
From: John	2 Recommendations Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 103300

Buddy wrote: But your contention that bad breath proves child molestation is PURE LUNACY. Yes, if one said this, it would be pure lunacy, but as you know, I never suggested that bad breath proves child molestation. Suggesting that I did make such a contention is absurd. Michelle Obama stated that her daughters are afraid to get into bed with their father because he stinks. It wasn't disclosed if it he stinks because of body odor, bad breath, or both. In response to that, I did not contend that "bad breath proves child molestation." What I did suggest is that is is plausible that Michelle may not be telling the truth about why her daughters are afraid to get into bed with their Obama. If Michelle were lying, what other reason would cause young girls to fear getting into bed with a Muslim man? Any clues? -ng- But, as I have said all along, I merely believe that it is plausible, but I think that the more likely explanation of Michelle revealing in public that her husband has poor personal hygiene, and bad enough to make his daughters avoid him, is that she is simply an uncouth idiot. So, she's probably an uncouth idiot, but it is plausible to consider there is something more to this story, perhaps something as bad as sexual abuse, especially when one considers who Obama is, what Obama is, and what Obama's family history involves. As we know, sexual perversions run in his family.

To: DuckTapeSunroof who wrote (65294)	2/1/2012 4:22:06 PM
From: jlallen	2 Recommendations Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 103300

Yes....splitting hairs over what is 'stinky" hardly removes the ignorance of that statement by John....