Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: DMaA who wrote (469029)	2/1/2012 9:28:10 AM
From: Murrey Walker	Respond to of 793958

So he better start pandering to me and people like me. Are you kidding? Politicians would pander to get votes? Ahhhhmazing! ;-)

To: DMaA who wrote (469029)	2/1/2012 9:33:22 AM
From: skinowski	2 Recommendations Respond to of 793958

IMO, what you are describing is an excellent principle to follow during the primaries. During the general election, I think, it still comes down to picking the lesser of the (d)evils. Obama and his people must have some serious plans for his second term, which they do not care to spell out. To paraphrase Nancy Pelosi, we would have to reelect him in order to find out what's on his mind.

To: DMaA who wrote (469029)	2/1/2012 9:59:00 AM
From: Geoff Altman	1 Recommendation Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 793958

I haven't been following the thread as closely as I usually do...... Has anyone done an issue by issue comparison of Newt and Mitts positions on fiscal changes they'd do once one of them got into office? They both want to kill Obamacare and Dodd Frank,,,, but what of things like tax reform? I'd put that right behind the aforementioned and I see that as key to repairing our broken gov't ..... No tax reform = big bandaid on a sore that never heals, the wound needs to be excised big time.