Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : The Obama - Clinton Disaster -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: jlallen who wrote (65327)	2/1/2012 4:32:14 PM
From: Honey_Bee	6 Recommendations Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 103300

Your attacks on John are really getting old. Be glad I'm not moderator, you arse would have been banned long ago.

To: jlallen who wrote (65327)	2/1/2012 4:51:34 PM
From: John	3 Recommendations Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 103300

jallen shows his racism, biases, and anti-White bigotry... jlallen: "There are no black Italians." [1] jlallen: "There is a difference between calling Bush a chimp and calling Mrs. Obama a smelly gorilla." [2] jlallen: "What if a pink elephant wanted to join the Congressional Black Caucus.....?" [3] jlallen shows his hypocrisy (again), his hatred for conservatives and Whites, and his disrespect for the host and conservative guests in the forum... jlallen: "Pompous ass. Its ignorant racist assholes like John...and their apologists such as yourself......" [4] jlallen: "the FACT remains that those attacks which I cited specifically (and there are others of that ilk on this board) ARE racist and ignorant." [5] 1. Message 27907190 2. Message 27869305 3. Message 27902200 4. Message 27909262 5. Message 27914735

To: jlallen who wrote (65327)	2/3/2012 2:23:05 PM
From: DuckTapeSunroof	3 Recommendations Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 103300

Re: "Yep. He is backpedaling of course...but that is EXACTLY the scurrilous, unsubstantiated nonsense he suggested as a basis for his ignorant post...." I would describe it as OBFUSCATING, not 'backpedaling'. Obfuscating, trying to throw up a smoke screen to confuse people about what has been said, and by whom, is the tactic I've noticed him resorting to more often in situations such as this. It's likely a face-saving measure. He never actually retreats in public when called out on obviously lunatic or factually incorrect postings... but most commonly he attempts to cloud the debate, confuse folks about what was actually written, drags in red herrings and rolls out smokescreens... whatever he thinks might work to deflect attention from an obvious falsehood that has been found out, or a strident racialist diatribe that comes to be seen (even in this company <g>) as too obvious, not subtle enough, too much over-the-top to be effective.