Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : Rocky Mountain Int'l (OTC:RMIL former OTC:OVIS) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Ditchdigger who wrote (20798)	11/21/1997 9:44:00 PM
From: Just My Opinion	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 55532

DD: I guess you know what you're doing, but to be honest..I don't..so I guess I'll just leave it at that. al

To: Ditchdigger who wrote (20798)	11/21/1997 10:00:00 PM
From: Riley G	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 55532

At 11:10 AM 11/21/97 -0500, you wrote: >In light of the recent press release, Mawork's increased posting today is in >my opinion a very good sign. > >In an academic sense it is interesting to watch the slow and steady >deterioration of the nays posting quality. The straws that a person will >grasp for show a great deal about their motivation, character and agenda. > >The company continues to fool the nays by actually doing what they say they >will. Do you realize that this is the fundamental issue that has trumped the >nays over and over? The company isn't doing anything incredible or >unusual... they are simply keeping their word, and that simple little issue >confounds the nays!!! > >It takes a bizzarre sense of reality and a near pathological imagination to >interpret a 10 million dollar cash infusion as bad news, but it is being >done on SI by the nays! I suggest a carreer in the lucrative market of >mystery and espionage novel writing. > >On the subject of Mawork's claim that Puhr (the real one, not the SI poster >with no e-mail address) stepped down due to NASD pressure.... I'm reluctant >to lend credibility to anything M(aw)ork says, but this particular statement >(despite his attempt to give it a negative spin) has a certain degree of >plausability. > >M(aw)ork is a smart fellow. He tells just enough of the truth to kind of be >vaguely "technically" right. Like calling the bottling plant a vet clinic. >Well, yes, it really was a vet clinic, but now it is not a vet clinic, it is >COMMERCIAL PROPERTY with a BOTTLING PLANT occupying the BUILDING where vets >perhaps once previously generated profits. See how technically being right >is a long way from objective reality? > >If it is true (which is completely unconfirmed rumor) I applaud Mr Puhr, and >his sacrifice of position for the sake of the company's good name, I applaud >him for avoiding even a hint or appearance of impropriety by stepping down. >Most importantly, I applaud the companies decision to make the old OVIS >principals top dogs. With Breton at the helm, my confidence level is even >higher.