Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Liberalism: Do You Agree We've Had Enough of It? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (123128)	2/2/2012 3:59:48 PM
From: TideGlider	2 Recommendations Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 224858

the context was that in which the very poor have a safety net.

To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (123128)	2/2/2012 4:12:59 PM
From: Ann Corrigan	4 Recommendations Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 224858

Reading comprehension challenged and a lawyer -- what's wrong with this picture? You're such a lefty propaganda robot, Ken -- have you done any thinking whatsoever for yourself in the past?

To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (123128)	2/2/2012 5:19:02 PM
From: locogringo	4 Recommendations Respond to of 224858

Romney says he is not concerned about the very poor. Why should he be concerned? He's not The President, and this phony president certainly doesn't care. Do you care about the poor? Your sidekick THUG Paul V didn't care this morning. He was counting more benefits for himself at the expense of the poor. Such a classy friend that you have there. "Consequently, I will be able to maximize my profits at the expense of the less affluent." Message 27922179