Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : International Precious Metals (IPMCF) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Chuca Marsh who wrote (28009)	11/21/1997 11:19:00 PM
From: Richard Mazzarella	Respond to of 35569

Chuca, forget the maps, you should do the press releases. Chatters will mill the ore in his mouth and Bill will instruct Chatters in proper mastication. <VBG>

To: Chuca Marsh who wrote (28009)	11/21/1997 11:25:00 PM
From: kimberley	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 35569

Chuca!!! <<Something like the RECOVERY NUMBERS were too good to be allowed to be said! Ratios had to be reproved -double-triple proved- Imput???(ie Exchanges...etc)(Logic folks- a contrary view or is it??? ??? ??? ??? ?) >> whoever the hell is putting this kind of stuff out ought to be shot... first of all, if there was one modicum of truth in that statement, IPM would never survive the ensuing lawsuits. can you see that logic?? whoever is telling you this kind of crap has lost touch with reality. I'm sorry, but this is insane. I see that the yeasayers are not really taking a vacation after all... the heat got a little too much online, but lets take it out via e-mail this time. keep the faith alive... after all, somebody has to look out for the little guys so they don't lose any of their shares. Chuck, just ask yourself one thing... have I ever lied to you? have other people... said things that turned out to be untrue? you are entirely too sweet natured and trusting, and methinks someone is taking advantage of that in a big way. best, kim

To: Chuca Marsh who wrote (28009)	11/21/1997 11:47:00 PM
From: Bob Jagow	Respond to of 35569

Too good--too good to be allowed to be said! That's it--yaah, that's it! [edit] PS. Grace stayed around for the Starship too, and the Stones are in Oakland now! Desert Stones. That's it--yaah, that's it! May we all endure the sticks and stones. bj

To: Chuca Marsh who wrote (28009)	11/22/1997 9:23:00 AM
From: ddl	Respond to of 35569

".Something like the RECOVERY NUMBERS were too good to be allowed to be said!" Chuky.... Please tell me honestly, do you beleive this at all? Perhaps you meant "true" instead of "allowed". - denis

To: Chuca Marsh who wrote (28009)	11/22/1997 9:54:00 AM
From: O. H. Rundell	Respond to of 35569

<< Another theory is EXCELLANT and going around..I will try to ask my friend to post it here...Something like the RECOVERY NUMBERS were too good to be allowed to be said! Ratios had to be reproved -double-triple proved- Imput???(ie Exchanges...etc)(Logic folks- a contrary view or is it??? ??? ??? ??? ?) >> Sorry, Chucaubud; don't think so. FWIW Le said the numbers were low. Regarding your source: Has this person ever been correct in predicting something about IPM before now? O. H.