Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : View from the Center and Left -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Dale Baker who wrote (181203)	2/3/2012 7:12:15 PM
From: Steve Lokness	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 542141

<<brought to us by the same woman who ended her life on government social support no less.>> Well that's just wrong on a number of levels. It's the same silly argument some use to urge millionaires to pay more in taxes than they owe so the debt gets paid down. Since it's not generally - yet - voluntary to pay into SS, common sense demands you would draw on it even though you might be philosophically against the program. .........but more to Rands specific case, I believe it was those taking care of her that went after that money. But like I say, doesn't matter; she was entitled, had paid in. I'm not a Rand fan, but I find it confusing as to why people twist what she really did. And I'm the one who believes in socialized medicine? Go figure.