SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: tejek who wrote (644570)2/4/2012 5:57:10 PM
From: TimF1 Recommendation  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1577178
 
In the past strong growth in the public sector has also been a drag on the private sector. People, physical resources, money, that would have been in the private sector, instead get pulled in to the government.

We wouldn't have a society without the public sector.

Not literally true, but such a society would likely not be nearly as good as what we have now. Of course the whole point is irrelevant because no one is saying 'eliminate the public sector", that's just an anarchist straw man for your to bash.



To: tejek who wrote (644570)2/5/2012 3:49:15 PM
From: Tenchusatsu  Respond to of 1577178
 
Ted, > No, it would complement it as it has in years past.

Deficit is well above $1 trillion annually. That's not a "complement," that's a mortgage.

> We wouldn't have a society without the public sector.

As usual, this is the favorite straw man of big government liberals. Either you're for big government or you're for no government.

Tenchusatsu