SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : View from the Center and Left -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Win Smith who wrote (181298)2/4/2012 5:19:48 PM
From: Cogito  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 543310
 
I think Jobs felt personally and professionally betrayed by Eric Schmidt, who sat on Apple's board saying nothing while iPhone plans were discussed for quite some time. Only after Google went public with its Android plans did Schmidt begin recusing himself from talking about iPhone issues.

But I agree with you that having that revenge mentality isn't a good thing. It's far more damaging to harbor a resentment than it is to be its object. Talking about spending the company's entire pile of cash in the effort to destroy Android was irresponsible. OK, maybe he was just blowing off steam at that moment. But it would have been irresponsible to do it.



To: Win Smith who wrote (181298)2/4/2012 6:00:43 PM
From: brushwud  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 543310
 
When Jobs came back...

You know he was a disciple of Ayn Rand's, right?



To: Win Smith who wrote (181298)2/5/2012 1:49:33 AM
From: bentway  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 543310
 
The entire conception of the Mac, mouse, icon-based graphic interface, etc., was stolen from Xerox. They already had systems like that they were selling way before the first Mac. But, for $20,000, not $2500!

I always wondered why Xerox never sued Apple.