SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : View from the Center and Left -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Dale Baker who wrote (181742)2/8/2012 3:14:03 PM
From: Land Shark  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 543020
 
Well she put the "Every sperm is sacred" clause in the bill as a sarcastic effort to point out the absurdity of it. It's like when the Pubs try to force religion down the throats of public schools, the Dems come in and put clauses in these bills to recognize the rights of Scientology or something to that effect. Then there's also the Church of the Flying Spaghetti Monster... They argue in court that their religion is just as valid as the christian versions anytime there's a challlenge that creationism be taught as science.



To: Dale Baker who wrote (181742)2/8/2012 3:15:31 PM
From: Sam  Respond to of 543020
 
Dale, she wasn't being serious, she introduced the bill as a joke.

This would outlaw masturbation by men, anal sex, sex with condoms, all forms of fellatio to completion, as well as numerous other acts. She later withdrew the measure, but stated that she had inserted it to highlight the absurdity and sexism inherent in the current bill.



To: Dale Baker who wrote (181742)2/8/2012 3:19:15 PM
From: bentway  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 543020
 
I think it's a joke, Dale!



To: Dale Baker who wrote (181742)2/8/2012 6:59:17 PM
From: Cogito  Respond to of 543020
 
>>That's why fundamental human rights issues should not be left up to the states. Even the Dems out in redneck red state land can be weirdos.<<

Though in this case the Senator was simply making a political statement, your larger point is absolutely correct. There has to be a baseline of rights that are guaranteed to all citizens. The equal protection clause of the 14th Amendment makes that a Federal matter.