SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Zitel-ZITL What's Happening -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: TEDennis who wrote (12949)11/22/1997 9:41:00 AM
From: Deep Digm  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 18263
 
Hi TED,

Thanks for your response. Always appreciated.
IMO, the benefit of a "portable factory" is its' "disposability".

About 8 months ago a good friend of mine, who also happens to be a world class engineer, sent me this explanation of what happens to certain classified material that comes into contact with computers. I posted it at the time, but here it is again;

>>"ÿ Any recordable media that has any electronic contact with information that falls into a 'compartmented' classification is handled exactly that way. D.O.D., U.S. Treasury and a dozen other agencies have areas which are so classified.

ÿ For floppies, you don't even need to read it on a classified computer. If it's been in the drive, it goes to the shredder.

ÿ There are ways to separate out unclassified information to get it out of a compartmented environment, but it's very complicated, and usually takes a lot of time, and several cleared people.

ÿ Hard drives are impossible. They have to be physically destroyed. Hard drives that have never even had power applied to them, if they've been in a computer that could possibly ever have seen classified data, they're history."<<

Put aside for a moment the question of validity of their product, they're selling an automated/semi-automated solution which involves electronics. If a production line can be added in a week or two for about $500K, a portable version should be a fraction of that, say $150K tops. To certain Federal agencies and paranoid CEO's it's a cheap price to guarantee the security of their data.

I'm not looking to provoke an argument (with others) as to whether the product is real or not; I had a great time last night and I'm still feeling warm and cuddly :))

I'm just commenting on whether the "concept" might make sense.

Have a good one.
Deep.



To: TEDennis who wrote (12949)11/22/1997 9:48:00 AM
From: Roger A. Babb  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 18263
 
Ted, Zitel has been implying that there is a lot of work going on with clients "behind the scenes" and clients that want to keep their identity secret from the beginning. But somehow this work never produces any revenue. It is now like the little boy crying wolf, no one believes it anymore. But if some of it were to prove true, the stock price would make a huge leap.