Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : JBII - The Secret Catalyst Turns Plastics into Oil -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: arvitar who wrote (302)	2/10/2012 12:01:32 PM
From: geico_caveman	3 Recommendations Respond to of 704

I love watching loser competitors fail miserably trying to stack up against JBII. Your company Agilyx makes the sludge you post about all the time. They will never be permitted to operate anywhere except Oregon, land of the meth meat heads. Waste Management will find out they backed #2 but those guys like wallowing in shiit. JBII is the First company to bring purified diesel fuel from plastic successfully to this Planet

To: arvitar who wrote (302)	5/6/2012 5:47:37 PM
From: Rawnoc	2 Recommendations Respond to of 704

New York Penal - Article 190 - § 190.25 Criminal Impersonation in the Second Degree "§ 190.25 Criminal impersonation in the second degree. A person is guilty of criminal impersonation in the second degree when he: 1. Impersonates another and does an act in such assumed character with intent to obtain a benefit or to injure or defraud another; or 2. Pretends to be a representative of some person or organization and does an act in such pretended capacity with intent to obtain a benefit or to injure or defraud another; or 3. (a) Pretends to be a public servant, or wears or displays without authority any uniform, badge, insignia or facsimile thereof by which such public servant is lawfully distinguished, or falsely expresses by his words or actions that he is a public servant or is acting with approval or authority of a public agency or department; and (b) so acts with intent to induce another to submit to such pretended official authority, to solicit funds or to otherwise cause another to act in reliance upon that pretense. 4. Impersonates another by communication by internet website or electronic means with intent to obtain a benefit or injure or defraud another, or by such communication pretends to be a public servant in order to induce another to submit to such authority or act in reliance on such pretense. Criminal impersonation in the second degree is a class A misdemeanor." law.onecle.com

To: arvitar who wrote (302)

10/10/2012 12:13:51 AM

From: Rawnoc

2 Recommendations Respond to of 704

Dead wrong. Court order item 1, setcion (a) mentions nothing about defamatory comments -- it's zero comments whatsoever lifetime gag oder it says, and I quote:

"...any comments, statements, questions, or communcationns of any kind whatsoever involving the Plantiffs..."

Clear as day.

To: jimmenknee who wrote ( 28776)	10/9/2012 10:54:46 PM
From: zzzogly	Read Replies (1) of 28779

"Ultimately JBI got the order for the Defendants to cease communicating..." Let me tell you why I think that order is vacant token. It orders that defendants or anyone acting on their behalf "are hereby restrained from discussing, disseminating, distributing, or communicating, in any manner whatsoever, defamatory comments with respect to or in any way related to the Plaintiffs". First, it doesn't say that the defendants ever made any defamatory comments. Second, it's only saying that the defendants can't do something that civil law already says they can't do. It isn't adding any requirement that would constrain their behavior beyond what the law currently does, and that doesn't already apply to everyone else in the world in addition to the defendants. Hence to my understanding, it is nothing more than an empty gesture by the judge (possibly contrived by JB's lawyer so his client could claim some kind of victory to those who don't read the order carefully), since nothing is gained or lost by the defendants, or changed, as a result of the order. I'm not a lawyer, nor do I have any legal education, and would be interested if someone with that background could give an educated opinion.