SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Maurice Winn who wrote (87120)2/11/2012 9:37:01 AM
From: Joseph Silent12 Recommendations  Respond to of 218670
 
The picture one has of you is that of a weasel. It makes little difference what once says .......

because, in your unlimited desire to try and show you are right ---- especially in matters far beyond you --- you invent statements to argue against.

I made a simple point. You talk about estimating probability in a particular context. Put down your sample space and your probability measure in that context. We start there. It's not polite to ask people to dig in your trash. :)

You see, you can invent anything you like. That is your brand, perhaps your special brand, of puffery. It does not mean you can understand.



To: Maurice Winn who wrote (87120)2/11/2012 9:51:45 AM
From: Joseph Silent3 Recommendations  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 218670
 
There are good odds of Taupo erupting. It's a certainty.


These two statements of yours suffice to demonstrate your mental limitations.

Example --- to drive it home:

1. There are good odds that MQ is complete fool.

2. It's a certainty.

Now to show us all how wise a man you are, demonstrate to the board how you arrived at #2 from #1.

Do not try this at home, unsupervised.