SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : View from the Center and Left -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Steve Lokness who wrote (182266)2/13/2012 9:02:10 AM
From: Win Smith  Respond to of 544137
 
Yes. But W made me nostalgic for his father more than Nixon, a distant memory. I didn't like GHWB when he was president, but looking back, he was overall pretty good. Had the guts to walk away from "read my lips", and the first Gulf war was a gritty and focused operation that I don't think anybody else could have pulled off as cleanly. Plus the US made money on the deal. He was a true public servant. "Best man for the job" Clarence Thomas still pisses me off, but Souter proved to be pretty reasonable.

After reliving 9/11 a bit last night through the Discovery Channel thing I plugged in Message 27945032 I thought, not for the first time, of the contrast between GHWB's reaction to the Kuwait invasion and the years of W's 9/11 24/7 act. Of course, GHWB had the advantage of an administration that wasn't seeded full of neocons by master infighter Dick Cheney, but W had enough public support post-9/11 that he could have actually been "a uniter not a divider" if he wanted. Instead, he gave free reign to the neocons' geopolitical fantasies and Rove's masterful "with us or for the terrorists" politicization. I can't quite hate W either, but I think of the pictures of GHWB hacking his way through a round of golf in the rain in the fall of 1990, clearly preoccupied with what he had to do, and W's regularly scheduled nap time all through his terms, and I wonder how those two could be father and son.