SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Follies who wrote (87182)2/13/2012 4:08:36 PM
From: Joseph Silent2 Recommendations  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 218916
 
You can't possibly be that dim, can you? It's clear you don't understand.

I took the precaution of saying I made that estimation without science, i.e., without probability theory.

Your and MQ's arguments have to do with science. That is why I said .... very good, let's proceed to science, and be precise, since you have complicated estimation problems. Sunrise is not a complicated estimation. A child can estimate for you.

If you worship science, why can't you use it well? You prefer gassy talk?

Now you are playing MQ's favorite trick and confusing both yourself and the issue.

Spending too much time doing the hind-lick maneuver on your teacher while he is choking can do that to you.

:)



To: Follies who wrote (87182)2/13/2012 4:49:02 PM
From: Joseph Silent  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 218916
 
Don't play confusion games in territory that is foreign to you.

This is what I said at the very start. I'll find the post if you like.

I have absolute certainty when I see your prattle, and my absolute certainty does not involve science. It is the same absolute certainty with which I know the sun will rise tomorrow.

Is it your contention that MQ does estimation using voodoo while pushing technology on all and sundry?