Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : American Presidential Politics and foreign affairs -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Farmboy who wrote (49211)	2/15/2012 1:07:35 PM
From: DuckTapeSunroof	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 71588

(I think the judge was a little peeved that no one showed up personally to defend <g> still he couldn't see sufficient facts or legal logic to proceed either.) I posted the RESULTS of the court action here because it seems that - as per usual - the initial charges were exuberantly posted here... but - again as per usual - the denouement somehow never shows up. :-)

To: Farmboy who wrote (49211)	2/15/2012 2:29:03 PM
From: Peter Dierks	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 71588

I do agree that a person born in the US is a natural born citizen That provision was inserted into the Constitution to prohibit Southern democrats from refusing to allow slaves and their children from voting. It was never meant as a an anchor baby provision. That interpretation is a perversion of the meaning of the Constitution. Did you notice that the judge merely ruled that there was not enough evidence to rule that Obama is an illegal immigrant? He did not rule that Obama is here legally.